Literature DB >> 7580362

Mitral regurgitation in patients with coronary artery disease and low left ventricular ejection fractions. How should it be treated?

J T Christenson1, F Simonet, J Maurice, A Bloch, V Velebit, M Schmuziger.   

Abstract

In recent years, coronary artery bypass grafting has been extended to include patients with very low left ventricular ejection fractions. Should concomitant mitral valve regurgitation be corrected simultaneously? Between January 1990 and July 1994, 43 patients with preoperative left ventricular ejection fractions < or = 25% and echocardiographic evidence of concomitant mitral valve regurgitation (grade I, 18 patients; II, 19 patients; and III, 6 patients) underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting. None of these patients underwent simultaneous mitral valve surgery. Twenty-four patients (56%) had pulmonary artery pressures > or = 40 mmHg (pulmonary hypertension). The mean preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was 18.7% +/- 4.4% (range, 10% to 25%), and the mean pulmonary artery pressure was 45.6 +/- 15.8 mmHg. The average of number of grafts per patient was 4.5 +/- 1.5. Five patients underwent simultaneous repair of a left ventricular aneurysm. The hospital mortality rate was 4.7% (2/43). Transient low cardiac output occurred postoperatively in 13 patients (30%). Sixteen patients (37%) had no postoperative complications. The average follow-up of the 41 hospital survivors was 6 months (range, 1 to 32 months). One patient died 8 months after surgery for an overall mortality rate of 7%. Another 2 patients had graft occlusions that did not require reoperation. In the 40 surviving patients, follow-up echocardiography revealed that 37 patients (93%) had either no mitral valve regurgitation or only very mild mitral valve regurgitation (grade I). Three patients had grade II mitral valve regurgitation, but none required mitral valve surgery. The New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly in all hospital survivors (from 3.4 +/- 0.6 to 1.7 +/- 0.7; p > 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fractions rose from 19.0% +/- 4.6% to 42.0% +/- 8.3%. Coronary artery bypass grafting is possible in patients with very low left ventricular ejection fractions who present with 2- or 3-vessel disease, significant coronary artery stenoses (less than or equal 70%), and angina. The mortality rate is acceptable and morbidity is low. If there is no rupture of papillary muscle or chordae, concomitant ischemic mitral regurgitation (grades I through III) seems to return to normal after coronary artery bypass grafting and, therefore, does not need to be corrected surgically during the primary operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7580362      PMCID: PMC325260     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  10 in total

1.  Functional recovery of hibernating myocardium after coronary bypass surgery: does it coincide with improvement in perfusion?

Authors:  Y Takeishi; I Tono-oka; I Kubota; K Ikeda; I Masakane; J Chiba; S Abe; K Tsuiki; A Komatani; I Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor ventricular function. Cardiovascular Surgeons of the University of Toronto.

Authors:  G T Christakis; R D Weisel; S E Fremes; J Ivanov; T E David; B S Goldman; T A Salerno
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Medical therapy of end-stage congestive and ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  C V Leier; D V Unverferth
Journal:  Cardiovasc Clin       Date:  1988

4.  Left ventricular aneurysmectomy. Resection or reconstruction.

Authors:  A D Jatene
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Improved long-term survival following myocardial revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  J G Coles; C Del Campo; S N Ahmed; R Corpus; A C MacDonald; M M Goldbach; J C Coles
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Coronary surgery can be an alternative to heart transplantation in selected patients with end-stage ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  G Dreyfus; D Duboc; A Blasco; C Dubois; D Brodaty; D Chatel; P H De Lentdecker; J Bachet; B Goudot; A Piquois
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Pathogenesis of ischemic mitral insufficiency.

Authors:  M R Llaneras; M L Nance; J T Streicher; P L Linden; S W Downing; J A Lima; R Deac; L H Edmunds
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Combined valve replacement and myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  A S Geha; C K Francis; G L Hammond; H Laks; G S Kopf; S W Hashim
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral insufficiency.

Authors:  W G Hendren; J J Nemec; B W Lytle; F D Loop; P C Taylor; R W Stewart; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Hemodynamic effect of myocardial revascularization in the impaired ventricle.

Authors:  R A Cukingnan; B G Brown; J H Wittig; J S Carey
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.209

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Should a regurgitant mitral valve be replaced simulataneously with a stenotic aortic valve?

Authors:  J T Christenson; B Jordan; A Bloch; M Schmuziger
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

2.  Mitral valve repair is not always needed in patients with functional mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  J E Lindeboom; W Jaarsma; J C Kelder; W J Morshuis; C A Visser
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.380

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.