Literature DB >> 7579510

Improved prognostication in small (pT1) breast cancers by image cytometry.

M Aubele1, G Auer, U Falkmer, A Voss, K Rodenacker, L E Rutquist, H Höfler.   

Abstract

Feulgen-stained samples from 460 small (pT1) primary breast cancers were investigated by means of an image analysis system. Several DNA, morphometrical and textural parameters were evaluated for each patient, and the prognostic meaning of these parameters was then investigated by the Cox regression analysis. As prognostic criterion a distant recurrence-free survival of five years was considered. All investigated DNA- and morphometrical parameters as well as several textural parameters showed a significant univariate correlation with the clinical course. In a multivariate approach the axillary nodal status was the most important prognostic parameter, followed by a morphometric parameter (anisokaryosis) and two textural parameters (runlength and co-occurrence). None of the DNA histogram derived parameters could add prognostic information in this multivariate approach. By the linear combination of the four selected variables, an individual prognostic factor was calculated. Using this factor the patients could be split into several groups according to their risk for distant metastases. Thus a low risk group of pT1 patients could be identified with a distant recurrence rate of only 2% after 5 years, and also a group of patients with a considerably worse prognosis and a 5-year distant recurrence rate of 53%. In contrast, using the nodal status as single parameter allows the identification of a low risk group of patients (pN0pT1) with a distant recurrence rate of 10.6%. Therefore, morphometrical and textural parameters can provide powerful prognostic information in small breast carcinomas and may allow a better selection of patients for adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7579510     DOI: 10.1007/BF00690188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  43 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of morphological parameters for infiltrating ductal breast cancer prognosis.

Authors:  G M Mariuzzi; V Mambelli; P Criante; S Sisti
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  The Multivariate Prognostic Index and nuclear DNA content are independent prognostic factors in primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J C van der Linden; J Lindeman; J P Baak; C J Meijer; C J Herman
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1989-01

Review 3.  Flow cytometric (DNA content and S-phase fraction) analysis of breast cancer.

Authors:  J G Batsakis; N Sneige; A K el-Naggar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognostic significance of DNA measurement determined by image analysis in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  R Mir; H Johnson; M Margolis; S Teplitz; L Wise
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  An image cytometric DNA-analysis in breast neoplasms. Parameters of DNA-aneuploidy and their relationship with conventional prognostic factors.

Authors:  A Longin; B Fontanière; V Pinzani; G Catimel; C Souchier; M Clavel; F Chauvin
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy in a series of 690 primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  H Beerman; P M Kluin; J Hermans; C J van de Velde; C J Cornelisse
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy.

Authors:  A Böcking; C P Adler; H H Common; M Hilgarth; B Granzen; W Auffermann
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol       Date:  1984-03

8.  Prognostic value of steroid hormone receptors: multivariate analysis of systemically untreated patients with node negative primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Thorpe; C Rose; B B Rasmussen; H T Mouridsen; T Bayer; N Keiding
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Prognostic significance of DNA measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A G Fallenius; G U Auer; J M Carstensen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Histological grade and other prognostic factors in relation to survival of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  L S Freedman; D N Edwards; E M McConnell; D Y Downham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genome Instability Profiles Predict Disease Outcome in a Cohort of 4,003 Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Annette Lischka; Natalie Doberstein; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Ayla Koçak; Timo Gemoll; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Analysis of DNA and morphometry in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M Aubele; G Auer; H Höfler
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.304

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.