Literature DB >> 7578795

Clinical evaluation of guided bone regeneration at exposed parts of Brånemark dental implants with and without bone allograft.

P Mattout1, H Nowzari, C Mattout.   

Abstract

This investigation evaluated guided bone regeneration with a polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membrane at exposed parts of Brånemark dental implants with and without concomitant use of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft. Density of the regenerated tissue was also determined using a No. 23 probe at a pressure of 25 g and was graded from 1 to 5. The higher index was associated with a higher resistance of newly formed tissue to the pressure of the probe. In 19 patients, 23 defects were treated by barrier membrane alone and 11 defects by bone allograft with barrier membrane. The width and the depth of the defects were determined at the time of the implant placement and at the second-stage implant surgery. When success was defined as 0 mm of residual defect, the mean success rate was 68% for the membrane group and 90% for the membrane group with bone allograft, with no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups. The two groups did not demonstrate a significant difference in median density index. There was a significant positive relationship between time of membrane coverage and density index. A density index of 4 was only recorded after 7 months of membrane coverage. The present findings suggest beneficial clinical effect with the use of membrane alone and freeze-dried bone allograft with membrane for guided bone regeneration. This study proposed the use of a novel density index for clinical evaluation of regenerated tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7578795     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060308.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  3 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Lily V Brügger; Stefan P Bienz; Jürg Hüsler; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Nicola U Zitzmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 5.021

2.  Effect of lateral bone augmentation procedures in correcting peri-implant bone dehiscence and fenestration defects: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mattia Severi; Anna Simonelli; Roberto Farina; Yu-Kang Tu; Cheng-Hsiang Lan; Ming-Chieh Shih; Leonardo Trombelli
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.259

Review 3.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?

Authors:  Omar Omar; Ibrahim Elgali; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.