BACKGROUND: Isolated lung transplantation is a viable therapeutic option for many patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. Other intrathoracic surgical procedures have a well documented incidence of phrenic nerve dysfunction, although the incidence after lung transplantation has not been studied. METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent lung transplantation were evaluated for evidence of phrenic nerve dysfunction and subsequent recovery. Risk factors contributing to the incidence of injury were examined. Phrenic nerve injury was defined by two separate diagnostic tests (Transcutaneous Phrenic Nerve Conduction Studies and Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic movement) used in combination. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients who were completely evaluated after the operation, eight had defining criteria for nerve injury--an incidence of 29.6%. Of those affected, the majority of injuries (89%) resulted in complete paralysis of the affected hemidiaphragm. The highest incidence of injury occurred in patients who underwent bilateral single lung transplantation (41%), with the right phrenic nerve being injured most often (78%). Fortunately, no significant postoperative morbidity was attributable to the occurrence of phrenic nerve injury when compared with those patients who did not sustain injury. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of possible risk factors resulted in the hypothesis that the likely mechanism of injury in these patients was due to stretching or direct instrumentation of the nerve, and thus measures should be instituted to minimize the possibility of injury.
BACKGROUND: Isolated lung transplantation is a viable therapeutic option for many patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. Other intrathoracic surgical procedures have a well documented incidence of phrenic nerve dysfunction, although the incidence after lung transplantation has not been studied. METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent lung transplantation were evaluated for evidence of phrenic nerve dysfunction and subsequent recovery. Risk factors contributing to the incidence of injury were examined. Phrenic nerve injury was defined by two separate diagnostic tests (Transcutaneous Phrenic Nerve Conduction Studies and Fluoroscopic evaluation of diaphragmatic movement) used in combination. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients who were completely evaluated after the operation, eight had defining criteria for nerve injury--an incidence of 29.6%. Of those affected, the majority of injuries (89%) resulted in complete paralysis of the affected hemidiaphragm. The highest incidence of injury occurred in patients who underwent bilateral single lung transplantation (41%), with the right phrenic nerve being injured most often (78%). Fortunately, no significant postoperative morbidity was attributable to the occurrence of phrenic nerve injury when compared with those patients who did not sustain injury. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of possible risk factors resulted in the hypothesis that the likely mechanism of injury in these patients was due to stretching or direct instrumentation of the nerve, and thus measures should be instituted to minimize the possibility of injury.
Authors: Santiago Garcia; Mariana Canoniero; Srinivasan Sattiraju; Lin Y Chen; Wayne Adkisson; Marshall Hertz; David G Benditt Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2011-09-30