Literature DB >> 7577485

Cyclosporin A and doxorubicin-ifosfamide in resistant solid tumours: a phase I and an immunological study.

R González-Manzano1, J Cid, A Brugarolas, C C Piasecki.   

Abstract

In order to test whether circumvention of clinical resistance can be obtained in common solid tumours by targeting different drug resistance mechanisms, a phase I clinical and immunological study was designed. The purpose of the study was to determine the dose of cyclosporin A (CsA), in combination with doxorubicin (DOX) and ifosfamide (IFX), needed to achieve steady-state whole-blood levels of 2000 ng ml-1 and the associated toxicity of this combination. Treatment consisted of CsA 5 mg kg-1 as a 2 h loading infusion, followed by a CsA 3 day continuous infusion (c.i.) (days 1-3) at doses that were escalated from 10 to 18 mg kg-1 day-1. Chemotherapy consisted of DOX 55 mg m-2 by i.v. 24 h c.i. (day 2) and IFX 2 g m-2 i.v. over 1 h on days 1 and 3. Treatments were repeated every 4 weeks. Eighteen patients with previously treated resistant solid tumours received 39 cycles. Mean steady-state CsA levels > or = 2000 ng ml-1 were reached at 5 mg kg-1 loading dose followed by a 3 day c.i. of 16 mg kg-1 day-1 or greater. Haematological toxicity was greater than expected for the same chemotherapy alone. One patient died of intracranial haemorrhage due to severe thrombopenia. Other observed toxicities were: asymptomatic hyperbilirubinaemia (46% cycles), mild nephrotoxicity (20% cycles), hypomagnesaemia (72% cycles), mild increase in body weight (100% cycles), hypertension (15% cycles) and headache (15% cycles). Overall the toxicity was acceptable and manageable. No alterations in absolute lymphocyte number, the lymphocyte subsets studied (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19) or CD4/CD8 ratio were observed in patients receiving more than one treatment cycle, although there were significant and non-uniform variations in the values of the different lymphocyte subsets studied when pre- and post-treatment values were compared. There was also a significant increase in the CD4/CD8 ratio. Tumour regressions were observed in two patients (epidermoid carcinoma of the cervix and Ewing's sarcoma). The CsA dose recommended for phase II trials is a 5 mg kg-1 loading dose followed by a 3-day c.i. of 16 mg kg-1 day-1 simultaneously with DOX and IFX at the doses administered in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7577485      PMCID: PMC2033951          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  29 in total

Review 1.  Multidrug resistance.

Authors:  I Pastan; M M Gottesman
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 13.739

2.  Phase II study of combining vinblastine and cyclosporin-A to circumvent multidrug resistance in renal cell cancer.

Authors:  C J Rodenburg; K Nooter; H Herweijer; C Seynaeve; R Oosterom; G Stoter; J Verweij
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Cyclosporin A suppresses cisplatin-induced c-fos gene expression in ovarian carcinoma cells.

Authors:  M Kashani-Sabet; W Wang; K J Scanlon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-07-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  P-glycoprotein expression as a predictor of the outcome of therapy for neuroblastoma.

Authors:  H S Chan; G Haddad; P S Thorner; G DeBoer; Y P Lin; N Ondrusek; H Yeger; V Ling
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-12-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  MDR1 gene expression and treatment outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  R Pirker; J Wallner; K Geissler; W Linkesch; O A Haas; P Bettelheim; M Hopfner; R Scherrer; P Valent; L Havelec
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Phase I pharmacokinetic study of cyclosporin A combined with doxorubicin.

Authors:  C Erlichman; M Moore; J J Thiessen; I G Kerr; S Walker; P Goodman; G Bjarnason; C DeAngelis; P Bunting
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Modulation of multidrug-resistant multiple myeloma by cyclosporin. The Leukaemia Group of the EORTC and the HOVON.

Authors:  P Sonneveld; B G Durie; H M Lokhorst; J P Marie; G Solbu; S Suciu; R Zittoun; B Löwenberg; K Nooter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Clinical significance of multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein expression on acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia cells at diagnosis.

Authors:  L Campos; D Guyotat; E Archimbaud; P Calmard-Oriol; T Tsuruo; J Troncy; D Treille; D Fiere
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Multidrug resistance (mdr1) gene expression in adult acute leukemias: correlations with treatment outcome and in vitro drug sensitivity.

Authors:  J P Marie; R Zittoun; B I Sikic
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  A phase II study of epidoxorubicin in colorectal cancer and the use of cyclosporin-A in an attempt to reverse multidrug resistance.

Authors:  J Verweij; H Herweijer; R Oosterom; M E van der Burg; A S Planting; C Seynaeve; G Stoter; K Nooter
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Drug-induced hypomagnesaemia : scope and management.

Authors:  Jacob Atsmon; Eran Dolev
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Interactions Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease Drugs and Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Galen Leung; Marianna Papademetriou; Shannon Chang; Francis Arena; Seymour Katz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12

3.  Cyclosporin A enhances locoregional metastasis of the CC531 rat colon tumour.

Authors:  W Van de Vrie; R L Marquet; A M Eggermont
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.553

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.