Literature DB >> 7577282

Conventional pneumoperitoneum compared with abdominal wall lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

L Lindgren1, A M Koivusalo, I Kellokumpu.   

Abstract

We have compared, in a randomized study, conventional carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum with abdominal wall lift in 25 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) (11 (SD 2) mm Hg vs 2.7 (9) mm Hg) (P < 0.01) and total amount of carbon dioxide used (40 (23) litre vs 9 (7) litre) (P < 0.001) were significantly less with abdominal wall lift. Pulmonary compliance was significantly greater (P < 0.01) in the abdominal wall lift group throughout operation. During the first 15 min of insufflation, arterial pressures were lower with abdominal wall lift (P < 0.05). In the conventional pneumoperitoneum group, femoral vein pressure increased (P < 0.01) and remained elevated for 3 h in the recovery room. Postoperative drowsiness was of significantly longer duration in the conventional pneumoperitoneum group than in the abdominal wall lift group (98 (46) min vs 13 (34) min) (P < 0.01). Postoperative nausea and vomiting and right shoulder pain occurred more often in patients with conventional pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.05). We conclude that the benefits of abdominal wall lift may be attributed to avoiding excessive carbon dioxide and high IAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7577282     DOI: 10.1093/bja/75.5.567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  18 in total

Review 1.  A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Kehlet; A W Gray; F Bonnet; F Camu; H B J Fischer; R F McCloy; E A M Neugebauer; M M Puig; N Rawal; C J P Simanski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Adverse cardiovascular changes induced by positive pressure pneumoperitoneum. Possible solutions to a problem.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Compliance of the abdominal wall during laparoscopic insufflation.

Authors:  Chuck Becker; Margaret A Plymale; John Wennergren; Crystal Totten; Kyle Stigall; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Role of Routine Subhepatic Abdominal Drain Placement following Uncomplicated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomised Study.

Authors:  Ankur Sharma; Sushil Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Effects of different anesthetic techniques on antidiuretic hormone secretion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M A M Youssef; A saleh Al-Mulhim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 8.  Surgical techniques to minimize shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Abdominal wall-lifting versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopy: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Ren; Yao Tong; Xi-Bing Ding; Xin Wang; Shu-Qing Jin; Xiao-Yin Niu; Xiang Zhao; Quan Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-06-15

10.  A Novel Strategy of Laparoscopic Insufflation Rate Improving Shoulder Pain: Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Kuo-Feng Hsu; Cheng-Jueng Chen; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Si-Yuan Wu; Bao-Chung Chen; Chih-Wei Yang; Teng-Wei Chen; Chung-Bao Hsieh; De-Chuan Chan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.