Literature DB >> 7576584

Selecting the best tone-pip stimulus-envelope time for estimating an objective middle-latency response threshold for low- and middle-tone sensorineural hearing losses.

Z M Xu1, E De Vel, B Vinck, P Van Cauwenberge.   

Abstract

The effects of rise-fall and plateau times for the Pa component of the middle-latency response (MLR) were investigated in normally hearing subjects, and an objective MLR threshold was measured in patients with low- and middle-tone hearing losses, using a selected stimulus-envelope time. Our results showed that the stimulus-envelope time (the rise-fall time and plateau time groups) affected the Pa component of the MLR (quality was determined by the (chi 2-test and amplitude by the F-test). The 4-2-4 tone-pips produced good Pa quality by visual inspection. However, our data revealed no statistically significant Na-Pa amplitude differences between the two subgroups studied when comparing the 2- and 4-ms rise-fall times and the 0- and 2-ms plateau times. In contrast, Na-Pa became significantly smaller from the 4-ms to the 6-ms rise-fall time and from the 2-ms to the 4-ms plateau time (paired t-test). This result allowed us to select the 2- or 4-ms rise-fall time and the 0- or 2-ms plateau time without influencing amplitude. Analysis of the stimulus spectral characteristics demonstrated that a rise-fall time of at least 2ms could prevent spectral splatter and indicated that a stimulus with a 5-ms rise-fall time had a greater frequency-specificity than a stimulus of 2-ms rise-fall time. When considering the synchronous discharge and frequency-specificity of MLR, our findings show that a rise-fall time of four periods with a plateau of two periods is an acceptable compromise for estimating the objective MLR threshold.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7576584     DOI: 10.1007/BF00185389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  16 in total

1.  Early averaged electroencephalic responses to clicks in neonates.

Authors:  C C McRandle; M A Smith; R Goldstein
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1974 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Middle-latency auditory components in response to clicks and low- and middle-frequency tone pips (0.5-1 kHz).

Authors:  M Maurizi; F Ottaviani; G Paludetti; M Rosignoli; G Almadori; A Tassoni
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1984

3.  Rise-fall time effects on the brainstem auditory evoked response: mechanisms.

Authors:  K Hecox; D Deegan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.

Authors:  K T Kavanagh; L A Harker; R S Tyler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb

5.  Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges.

Authors:  K Kodera; R F Hink; O Yamada; J I Suzuki
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979

6.  The effect of onset, offset and rise-decay times of tone bursts on brain stem response.

Authors:  K Kodera; H Yamane; O Yamada; J I Suzuki
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1977

7.  Threshold sensitivity and frequency specificity in auditory brainstem response audiometry.

Authors:  H Davis; S K Hirsh; L L Turpin; M E Peacock
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1985

8.  Prediction of sensorineural hearing level from the brain stem evoked response.

Authors:  J Jerger; L Mauldin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-08

9.  Extracranial responses to acoustic clicks in man.

Authors:  C D GEISLER; L S FRISHKOPF; W A ROSENBLITH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Auditory middle-latency responses in humans.

Authors:  O Ozdamar; N Kraus
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1983
View more
  1 in total

1.  Middle-latency responses to assess objective thresholds in patients with noise-induced hearing losses and Ménière's disease.

Authors:  Z M Xu; E De Vel; B Vinck; P Van Cauwenberge
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.