OBJECTIVE: To describe sexual interaction and HIV-related communication in Rwandan couples and to examine their relationship to HIV testing and condom use. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a longitudinal cohort. METHODS: In 1988, women recruited for an epidemiological study of HIV, and interested male partners, received confidential HIV testing and counseling. Two years after enrollment, 876 women reporting one steady partner in the past year completed a questionnaire addressing sexual and HIV-related communication, sexual motivation and violence in the partnership. RESULTS: Men control sexual decision making, and coercive sex and violence between partners is not uncommon. HIV-positive women were more likely to report coercive sex and less likely to have discussed their test results with their partner. Women with HIV-positive partners were more likely to report being physically abused. Condom use was more common if the man had been previously tested, and if women reported discussing or negotiating condom use. HIV-negative women with untested or seronegative partners were the least likely to use condoms or to discuss or attempt to negotiate condom use. CONCLUSIONS: Participation of the male partner is crucial for successful HIV risk reduction in couples. HIV testing and counseling of couples has beneficial long term effects on condom use and HIV-related communication. Couple communication is associated with condom use, but only when the discussion is specific (sexually transmitted disease risks and using condoms). Seronegative women with untested partners are at increased risk for HIV as they are the least likely to discuss or attempt to negotiate condom use.
OBJECTIVE: To describe sexual interaction and HIV-related communication in Rwandan couples and to examine their relationship to HIV testing and condom use. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a longitudinal cohort. METHODS: In 1988, women recruited for an epidemiological study of HIV, and interested male partners, received confidential HIV testing and counseling. Two years after enrollment, 876 women reporting one steady partner in the past year completed a questionnaire addressing sexual and HIV-related communication, sexual motivation and violence in the partnership. RESULTS:Men control sexual decision making, and coercive sex and violence between partners is not uncommon. HIV-positive women were more likely to report coercive sex and less likely to have discussed their test results with their partner. Women with HIV-positive partners were more likely to report being physically abused. Condom use was more common if the man had been previously tested, and if women reported discussing or negotiating condom use. HIV-negative women with untested or seronegative partners were the least likely to use condoms or to discuss or attempt to negotiate condom use. CONCLUSIONS: Participation of the male partner is crucial for successful HIV risk reduction in couples. HIV testing and counseling of couples has beneficial long term effects on condom use and HIV-related communication. Couple communication is associated with condom use, but only when the discussion is specific (sexually transmitted disease risks and using condoms). Seronegative women with untested partners are at increased risk for HIV as they are the least likely to discuss or attempt to negotiate condom use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Africa; Africa South Of The Sahara; Barrier Methods; Behavior; Clinic Activities; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Correlation Studies; Counseling; Crime; Developing Countries; Diseases; Domestic Violence; Eastern Africa; Family Planning; Female Role; French Speaking Africa; Hiv Infections; Interpersonal Relations; Longitudinal Studies; Male Role; Organization And Administration; Partner Communication; Program Activities; Programs; Research Methodology; Risk Reduction Behavior; Rwanda; Sex Behavior; Social Behavior; Social Problems; Statistical Studies; Studies; Viral Diseases
Authors: Suzanne Maman; Jessie K Mbwambo; Nora M Hogan; Gad P Kilonzo; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Ellen Weiss; Michael D Sweat Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ellen Setsuko Hendriksen; Audrey Pettifor; Sung-Jae Lee; Thomas J Coates; Helen V Rees Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M Cartoux; P Msellati; N Meda; C Welffens-Ekra; L Mandelbrot; V Leroy; P Van de Perre; F Dabis Journal: AIDS Date: 1998-12-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: M C Smith Fawzi; W Lambert; J M Singler; Y Tanagho; F Léandre; P Nevil; D Bertrand; M S Claude; J Bertrand; M Louissaint; L Jeannis; J S Mukherjee; S Goldie; J J Salazar; P E Farmer Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Joy D Scheidell; Typhanye P Dyer; MacRegga Severe; Yazmeen E Tembunde; Kailyn E Young; Maria R Khan Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2020-02-24
Authors: Suniti Solomon; Ramnath Subbaraman; Sunil S Solomon; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Sethulakshmi C Johnson; C K Vasudevan; Santhanam Anand; Aylur K Ganesh; David D Celentano Journal: Violence Against Women Date: 2009-05-15