Literature DB >> 7575968

Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implants, standard abutments, and laboratory analogs.

P P Binon1.   

Abstract

Thirteen implants having external hexagonal extensions were evaluated for machining accuracy and consistency. A composite score was derived to evaluate overall manufacturing accuracy and consistency of the implants evaluated in this study. A technique to determine the rotational freedom between implant and abutment is described, and the coronal hexagonal matings of selected implants and abutments is evaluated and reported. Crossover use and combinations of products from different manufacturers was also evaluated for rotational freedom. Two nonexternal hexagonal extension implant configurations were measured for rotational movement as contrasting and comparative values.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7575968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  10 in total

1.  Effect of cement washout on loosening of abutment screws and vice versa in screw- and cement- retained implant-supported dental prosthesis.

Authors:  Seok-Gyu Kim; Chae-Heon Chung; Mee-Kyoung Son
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  The change of rotational freedom following different insertion torques in three implant systems with implant driver.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Kwon; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim; Jae-Seung Chang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  A comparative study of gold UCLA-type and CAD/CAM titanium implant abutments.

Authors:  Ji-Man Park; Jai-Bong Lee; Seong-Joo Heo; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Niloufar Mousavi; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  A Comparative Analysis of Implants Presenting Different Diameters: Extra-Narrow, Narrow and Conventional.

Authors:  Henrique Tuzzolo Neto; Alessandra Sayuri Tuzita; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; Renata de Vasconcellos Moura; Márcio Zaffalon Casati; Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Rotational tolerances of a titanium abutment in the as-received condition and after screw tightening in a conical implant connection.

Authors:  Rosario Prisco; Giuseppe Troiano; Luigi Laino; Khrystyna Zhurakivska
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Influence of the implant abutment types and the dynamic loading on initial screw loosening.

Authors:  Eun-Sook Kim; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Accuracy combining different brands of implants and abutments.

Authors:  María-Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Eduardo Selva-Otaolaurruchi; Gisela Senent-Vicente; Inés González-de-Cossio; Vicente Amigó-Borrás
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 9.  Implant fractures: Rare but not exceptional.

Authors:  Sahitya Sanivarapu; Srinivas Moogla; Rupa Sruthi Kuntcham; Lakshmi Kanth Kolaparthy
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

10.  Accuracy of fit of implant-supported bars fabricated on definitive casts made by different dental stones.

Authors:  Ioannis Kioleoglou; Argirios Pissiotis; Michalakis Konstantinos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.