Literature DB >> 7574381

Therapeutic options for cancer of the hypopharynx and cervical oesophagus.

R Bardini1, A Ruol, A Peracchia.   

Abstract

Between 1980 and 1990, 291 patients with a cancer in the cervical area of the oesophagus were admitted to our Department: in 187 the cancer was located mainly in the cervical region, 76 in the hypopharynx and 28 had a tumour that had spread to the cervical oesophageal region following laryngectomy. Most tumours of the hypopharynx involved the cervical oesophagus when it was often difficult to define the site of origin. 153 patients (53%) underwent surgical resection which included a modified neck dissection followed by different kinds of reconstruction. 96 patients underwent pharyngogastric anastomosis. Twenty anastomotic leaks (23%) were recorded including both those clinically evident and asymptomatic ones detected radiologically. Moreover, segmental proximal necrosis was seen in ten patients. Hospital mortality rate after pharyngogastric anastomosis was 14.7% (14/95). Colon interposition was used in 11 patients. Two anastomotic leaks and two partial necroses were observed. Hospital mortality was 18% (2/11). Eighteen patients underwent laryngopharyngectomy and cervical oesophagectomy with reconstruction performed by means of revascularized jejunal loop. One anastomotic leak was observed and hospital mortality was nil in these cases. Twenty-four patients underwent total oesophagectomy with larynx preservation when the cancer was located at least 2 cm below the upper oesophageal sphincter. Five anastomotic leaks and two partial necroses occurred and hospital mortality was 8.3% (2/24) in these patients. The remaining five patients operated on underwent miscellaneous surgical procedures with one postoperative death. Overall survival for resections considered curative was 21%:37% for hypopharyngeal and 18% for cervical cancers respectively, while it was nil at three years after palliative resection and total oesophagectomy with larynx preservation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7574381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol        ISSN: 0355-9521


  5 in total

1.  Hypopharyngeal reconstruction: a comparison of three alternatives.

Authors:  Alaa Eldin Elfeky; Wail Fayez Nasr; Alaa Khazbak; Mohamed Said Abdelrahman; Zaki Abdelgawad Allam; Wahed Yousry Gareer; Hesham Elsebaey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Current management of cervical esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Daniel King Hung Tong; Simon Law; Dora Lai Wan Kwong; William I Wei; Raymond Wai Man Ng; Kam Ho Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Radical resection or chemoradiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Shah-Hwa Chou; Hsien-Pin Li; Jui-Ying Lee; Meei-Feng Huang; Chia-Hua Lee; Ka-Wo Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Larynx-Preserving Surgery for Cervical Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kun-Yao Dai; Yu-Chao Yu; Yi-Shing Leu; Chih-Wen Chi; Mei-Lin Chan; Chung-Hsin Tsai; Huan-Chau Lin; Wen-Chien Huang; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Management algorithm for failed gastric pull up reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Oleksandr Butskiy; Donald W Anderson; Eitan Prisman
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.