Literature DB >> 7574319

A 5-year audit of outcome of apicectomies carried out in a district general hospital.

A J Lyons1, C E Hughes, E J Dixon.   

Abstract

Success rates of up to 90% have been claimed for apicectomy. However, the conditions that this procedure is carried out under at district general hospitals may be at variance with such studies. A 5-year audit of outcome was therefore carried out within a district general hospital. It was found that 89% of apicected teeth still remained at 5 years. Outcome was not influenced by any of the factors examined, and could not be predicted radiographically. Most failures occurred after the average postoperative review period of 10.5 months. Patient satisfaction with the procedure was high at over 90%. Based on these results it was concluded that apicectomy was an effective procedure when carried out by staff of all grades within the district general hospital, and that repeated follow-up appointments with radiographs over the first postoperative year were not useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7574319      PMCID: PMC2502352     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  4 in total

1.  Periapical surgery.

Authors:  J M Hirsch; U Ahlström; P A Henrikson; G Heyden; L E Peterson
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1979-06

2.  A follow-up study of 1,000 cases treated by endodontic surgery.

Authors:  J Rud; J O Andreasen; J E Jensen
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1972

3.  The success rate of apicectomy. A retrospective study of 1,016 cases.

Authors:  F J Harty; B J Parkins; A M Wengraf
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1970-11-03       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Endodontic recall radiographs: how reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability?

Authors:  K L Zakariasen; D A Scott; J R Jensen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1984-03
  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Impact of a restorative dentistry service on the prescription of apical surgery in a district general hospital.

Authors:  H Beckett
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic microsurgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minji Kang; Hoi In Jung; Minju Song; Sue Youn Kim; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Frequency of persistent tooth pain after root canal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donald R Nixdorf; Estephan J Moana-Filho; Alan S Law; Lisa A McGuire; James S Hodges; Mike T John
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Comparison of the success rate of endodontic treatment and implant treatment.

Authors:  Ranya Faraj Elemam; Iain Pretty
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-06-15

5.  Ambulatory oral surgery: 1-year experience with 11680 patients from Zagreb district, Croatia.

Authors:  Dražen Jokić; Darko Macan; Berislav Perić; Marinka Tadić; Josip Biočić; Petar Đanić; Davor Brajdić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.351

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.