Literature DB >> 7574124

Can a day 4 bone scan accurately determine the presence or absence of scaphoid fracture?

D G Murphy1, M A Eisenhauer, J Powe, W Pavlofsky.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of day 4 bone scans in predicting the presence or absence of fracture in patients with "clinical scaphoid fracture."
DESIGN: Prospective sensitivity study of ED patients with clinical scaphoid fractures. Each patient was immobilized in a thumb spica cast and had day 4 bone scans of both wrists and hands. Blinded day 4 bone scan results were ultimately compared with the diagnosis on day 14 when patients returned for repeat clinical examination and radiographs. In cases of equivocal radiographic or clinical examination results, a day 14 bone scan was performed.
SETTING: Two tertiary care teaching hospital emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: All ED patients older than 16 years with the diagnosis of clinical scaphoid fracture were eligible.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled and successfully completed the study protocol from October 1990 through November 1992. One patient had bilateral injury, for a total of 100 completed studies. Day 4 bone scans were 100% sensitive and 92% specific, for a positive predictive value of 65%, a negative predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 93% (95% confidence interval, 88%, to 98%). Many other types of fractures were identified on the day 4 scans, including those of the triquetra, distal radius, capitate, hamate, trapezoid, trapezium, and metacarpals.
CONCLUSION: Day 4 bone scans are an accurate means of ruling out scaphoid fracture. However, because of a significant number of false-positive scans at day 4, they do not reliably confirm the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture. The bone scans also permitted identification of several other wrist fractures that had not been radiographically apparent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7574124     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70110-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  7 in total

Review 1.  Risk reduction through skeletal scintigraphy as a screening tool in suspected scaphoid fracture: a literature review.

Authors:  D Chakravarty; J Sloan; J Brenchley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Systematic Review of Diagnosis of Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures.

Authors:  Henrik Constantin Bäcker; Chia H Wu; Robert J Strauch
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2019-07-21

Review 3.  Review of the current methods in the diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures.

Authors:  E Krasin; M Goldwirth; A Gold; D R Goodwin
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Scaphoid fracture. Review of diagnostic tests and treatment.

Authors:  H E Schubert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhong-Gang Yin; Jian-Bing Zhang; Shi-Lian Kan; Xiao-Gang Wang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Lodox/Statscan facilitates the early detection of commonly overlooked extracranial injuries in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  H-C Huang; C-Y Fu; C-H Hsieh; Y-C Wang; S-C Wu; R-J Chen; J-C Huang
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Introducing a Clinical Practice Guideline Using Early CT in the Diagnosis of Scaphoid and Other Fractures.

Authors:  Steven Pincus; Merle Weber; Alex Meakin; Ross Breadmore; David Mitchell; Luke Spencer; Nathan Anderson; Phil Catterson; Steve Farish; Jaycen Cruickshank
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.