Literature DB >> 7573734

Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy.

J T Mäkelä1, H Kiviniemi, T Juvonen, S Laitinen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify patients who have high risk of wound dehiscence and who might benefit from the use of internal retention sutures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with midline abdominal wound dehiscence were compared with 48 control patients standardized by sex, age, and operative indication.
RESULTS: The mean hospital stay was significantly prolonged in the dehiscence group, resulting in a higher total cost of hospital treatment. The variables that were significantly associated with wound dehiscence included hypoalbuminemia, anemia, malnutrition, chronic lung disease, and emergency procedure. The additional postoperative factors that were found to be significant were vomiting, prolonged intestinal paralysis, repeated urinary retention, and increased coughing. Obesity, chronic heart disease, diabetes, alcoholism, preoperative intestinal obstruction, jaundice, systemic and local infection, use of steroids, type of incision, operating time, and type of wound closure were nonsignificant variables. The number of wound dehiscences increased significantly (P = 0.0001) when the number of risk factors increased from zero to five.
CONCLUSION: We recommend using internal retention sutures for patients who have three or more risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7573734     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80309-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  32 in total

1.  Complications requiring reoperation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 17 years experience in a single institute.

Authors:  Sung Jin Oh; Won Beom Choi; Jyewon Song; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Postsurgical giant incisional hernia.

Authors:  Daisuke Usuda; Takuro Mizuno; Hitoshi Saito; Shigeki Takashima
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-04-15

3.  Wound dehiscence: outcome comparison for sutured and mesh reconstructed patients.

Authors:  P Petersson; A Montgomery; U Petersson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Lars Tue Sørensen; Ulla Hemmingsen; Finn Kallehave; Peer Wille-Jørgensen; Johan Kjaergaard; Lisbeth Nørgaard Møller; Torben Jørgensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Postoperative abdominal evisceration in children: possible risk factors.

Authors:  Murat Kemal Ciğdem; Abdurrahman Onen; Selçuk Otçu; Hatun Duran
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Chronic kidney disease is associated with high abdominal incisional hernia rates and wound healing disturbances.

Authors:  Andreas Heller; Saskia E Westphal; Peter Bartsch; Michael Haase; Peter R Mertens
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Investigation into the optimal prosthetic material for wound healing of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Adem Akcakaya; Ibrahim Aydogdu; Bulent Citgez
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  [Fascial healing and wound failure].

Authors:  V Fackeldey; J Höer; U Klinge
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Development and testing of a vaginal pressure sensor to measure intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Evan M Rosenbluth; Paul J Johnson; Robert W Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model.

Authors:  Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst; Jeroen Nieuwenhuizen; Wim C J Hop; Pauline Arends; Johan Boom; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.