Literature DB >> 7572681

Prospective meta-analysis of cholesterol-lowering studies: the Prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project and the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) Collaboration.

R J Simes1.   

Abstract

Meta-analyses of randomized trials evaluating cholesterol-lowering therapy have demonstrated clear reductions in coronary events and coronary mortality. However, the treatment impact on total mortality has been less certain. With the variable selection of trials and treatment questions, results of meta-analyses have sometimes given conflicting conclusions regarding the magnitude of treatment effects and the populations to whom benefits might accrue. Prospective meta-analysis can avoid these problems by clearly specifying the research questions, eligible studies, analysis plans, and outcome definitions in advance of trial results publication. This approach has been adopted in 2 major prospective meta-analyses of cholesterol-lowering treatments: the Prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) project and the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) collaboration. The PPP project is a prospectively planned combined analysis of 3 large-scale pravastatin trials comparing pravastatin against placebo over a minimum 5-year period. The analysis will contain data for > 19,500 patients and should have the power to examine the effects of treatment on total mortality, coronary mortality, and incidence of cancers as well as the ability to look at total coronary events in important subgroups underrepresented in previous trials. The CTT collaboration is a planned prospective meta-analysis of 12 major ongoing or planned randomized trials evaluating therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, a fibrate, or dietary modification. The trials were prospectively registered and the CTT protocols became final in November 1994. By the year 2000, the CTT collaboration is projected to have information on about 65,000 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7572681     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80482-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors for prevention of stroke.

Authors:  S Warshafsky; D Packard; S J Marks; N Sachdeva; D M Terashita; G Kaufman; K Sang; A J Deluca; S J Peterson; W H Frishman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Meta-analyses of antihypertensive therapy: Are some of them misleading?

Authors:  E Grossman; U Goldbourt
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Does pravastatin promote cancer in elderly patients? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefanos Bonovas; Nikolaos M Sitaras
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Pravastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and clinical effectiveness in the management of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  M Haria; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol.

Authors:  Lisa M Askie; Peter Brocklehurst; Brian A Darlow; Neil Finer; Barbara Schmidt; William Tarnow-Mordi
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Sequential methods for random-effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Anne Whitehead; Mark Simmonds
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration.

Authors:  Lisa M Askie; Brian A Darlow; Neil Finer; Barbara Schmidt; Ben Stenson; William Tarnow-Mordi; Peter G Davis; Waldemar A Carlo; Peter Brocklehurst; Lucy C Davies; Abhik Das; Wade Rich; Marie G Gantz; Robin S Roberts; Robin K Whyte; Lorrie Costantini; Christian Poets; Elizabeth Asztalos; Malcolm Battin; Henry L Halliday; Neil Marlow; Win Tin; Andrew King; Edmund Juszczak; Colin J Morley; Lex W Doyle; Val Gebski; Kylie E Hunter; Robert J Simes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Data sharing among data monitoring committees and responsibilities to patients and science.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Douglas G Altman; Hazel McHaffie; Nancy Owens; Richard W I Cooke
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research.

Authors:  Alexander J Sutton; Nicola J Cooper; David R Jones
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Pitfalls in the design and analysis of paediatric clinical trials: a case of a 'failed' multi-centre study, and potential solutions.

Authors:  Johanna H van der Lee; Michael W T Tanck; Judit Wesseling; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.