Literature DB >> 7572617

Efficacy of high-intensity exercise training on left ventricular ejection fraction in men with coronary artery disease (the Training Level Comparison Study).

A Oberman1, G F Fletcher, J Lee, N Nanda, B J Fletcher, B Jensen, E S Caldwell.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare high- versus low-intensity exercise training on the change in echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from rest to peak exercise. Sedentary men with coronary artery disease, aged 30 to 70 years, were randomized to dynamic exercise training of either low intensity, 50% of maximal oxygen consumption, n = 89; or high intensity, 85% of maximal oxygen consumption, n = 111. No other interventions were imposed and patients were evaluated at 6 months and 1 year. Both exercise groups significantly increased exercise capacity without adverse events, but the increase was greater (p = 0.02) in the high-intensity exercise group. The mean exercise test rest-peak LVEF in the high-intensity group rose from 6.20% at baseline to 6.54% in 6 months and to 6.73% at 12 months, while the low-intensity group showed no improvement at 6 months and a decrease at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that treatment group (high versus low intensity) significantly contributed to the change in rest-peak LVEF. When the exercise groups were subdivided by initial baseline LVEF < or = 50% versus > 50%, those with the higher LVEF in the high-intensity group showed a greater (p = 0.05) increase in the rest-peak LVEF from baseline to 1 year. Over a 1-year period, exercise capacity improved in both exercise-intensity groups, but more so in the high-intensity group, with no adverse events. The high-intensity group, compared with the low-intensity, showed more improvement in the rest-peak LVEF, especially in those with a higher LVEF at baseline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7572617     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80189-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Exercise in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  H J Bethell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Endurance exercise intensity determination in the rehabilitation of coronary artery disease patients: a critical re-appraisal of current evidence.

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; An Stevens; Bert O Eijnde; Paul Dendale
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  High versus low training frequency in cardiac rehabilitation using a systems model of training.

Authors:  S Le Bris; B Ledermann; N Topin; P Messner-Pellenc; D Le Gallais
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The impact of training modalities on the clinical benefits of exercise intervention in patients with cardiovascular disease risk or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Luc J C van Loon; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Rehabilitation in cardiac patients:what do we know about training modalities?

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Jan Berger; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 6.  Vascular Ageing and Exercise: Focus on Cellular Reparative Processes.

Authors:  Mark D Ross; Eva Malone; Geraint Florida-James
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Effects of high-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Deng Pan; Yimeng Gu; Rumeng Wang; Yanyan Wu; Mei Xue
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.