Literature DB >> 7572615

Factors affecting microbiological colony count accuracy for bioaerosol sampling and analysis.

C W Chang1, S A Grinshpun, K Willeke, J M Macher, J Donnelly, S Clark, A Juozaitis.   

Abstract

The effects of the following variables on the occurrence of colony masking (the indistinguishable merging or overlap of sufficiently close colonies) were evaluated experimentally using the bacterium Bacillus subtilis: spore density on a collection surface, concentration of nutrients in the culture medium, sample incubation time, and ability of an observation system to distinguish overlapped colonies. Increasing spore surface density and incubation time increased colony masking, whereas lowering nutrient concentration decreased colony diameter and, therefore, masking but also limited spore germination and growth. Overall, full-strength medium was best for accurate counting of early microcolonies examined with the aid of a microscope, whereas half- or quarter-strength medium was better for counting older readily observable macrocolonies. Masking bias was determined for varying spore surface densities and colony diameters and was applied to two widely used slit-to-agar bioaerosol impactors. Appropriate collection times have been determined for these samplers to minimize colony masking for expected bioaerosol concentrations. It was found, for example, that 6-min samples collected from an environment with an air concentration of 10(3) CFU m-3 would result in colony surface densities, for 3-mm colonies, of 1.5 and 3.9 microorganisms cm-2 for the two samplers with respective masking biases of < 10% and < 20%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7572615     DOI: 10.1080/15428119591016403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of methods for detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement.

Authors:  S Terzieva; J Donnelly; V Ulevicius; S A Grinshpun; K Willeke; G N Stelma; K P Brenner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Use of a foam spatula for sampling surfaces after bioaerosol deposition.

Authors:  Rafal Lewandowski; Krystyna Kozlowska; Malgorzata Szpakowska; Malgorzata Stepinska; Elzbieta A Trafny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Exposure of workers to airborne microorganisms in open-air swine houses.

Authors:  C W Chang; H Chung; C F Huang; H J Su
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sampling port for real-time analysis of bioaerosol in whole body exposure system for animal aerosol model development.

Authors:  Divey Saini; Gregory W Hopkins; Ching-Ju Chen; Sarah A Seay; Eva M Click; Sunhee Lee; Justin M Hartings; Richard Frothingham
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  Characteristics of airborne actinomycete spores.

Authors:  T A Reponen; S V Gazenko; S A Grinshpun; K Willeke; E C Cole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.