Literature DB >> 7570395

Environmental risks: scientific concepts and social perception.

P Vineis1.   

Abstract

Using the example of air pollution, I criticize a restricted utilitarian view of environmental risks. It is likely that damage to health due to environmental pollution in Western countries is relatively modest in quantitative terms (especially when considering cancer and comparing such damage to the effects of some life-style exposures). However, a strictly quantitative approach, which ranks priorities according to the burden of disease attributable to single causes, is questionable because it does not consider such aspects as inequalities in the distribution of risks. Secondly, the ability of epidemiological research to identify some health effects is limited. Third, the environment has symbolic and aesthetic components that overcome a strict evaluation of damage based on the impairment of human health. It is not acceptable that priorities be set just balancing the burden of disease caused by pollution in the environment against economic constraints. As an example of a computation that inherently includes economic analysis, I refer to the proposal of an estimator of mortality in coal mining, i.e., a rate which puts deaths in the numerator and tons of coal extracted in the denominator. According to this estimator, mortality due to accidents decreased from 1.15 to 0.42 in the period 1950-1970 in the United States, for each million tons of coal extracted. However, considering the steep decline in the workforce in the same period, the traditional mortality rate (deaths over persons-time) actually increased. The proposal of a measure of mortality based on the amount of coal extracted is just one example of the attempts to influence decisions by including an economic element (productivity) in risk assessment. This paper has three purposes: One, to describe empirical research concerning the health effects of environmental pollutants; two, to discuss the scientific principles and methods used in the identification of environmental hazards; and three, to critically discuss some of the ethical principles which are applied in medicine and in the assessment and management of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7570395     DOI: 10.1007/BF00998542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med        ISSN: 0167-9902


  29 in total

1.  Valuing the health benefits of clean air.

Authors:  J V Hall; A M Winer; M T Kleinman; F W Lurmann; V Brajer; S D Colome
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Pulmonary function and ambient particulate matter: epidemiological evidence from NHANES I.

Authors:  L G Chestnut; J Schwartz; D A Savitz; C M Burchfiel
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1991 May-Jun

3.  Air pollution: I--From pea souper to photochemical smog.

Authors:  F Godlee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-07

4.  A retrospective cohort study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust exposure in railroad workers.

Authors:  E Garshick; M B Schenker; A Muñoz; M Segal; T J Smith; S R Woskie; S K Hammond; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1988-04

Review 5.  Risk assessment and occupational health. Conceptual problems.

Authors:  F N Laird
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Changes in lung function of children after an air pollution decrease.

Authors:  W Arossa; S Spinaci; M Bugiani; P Natale; C Bucca; G de Candussio
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1987 May-Jun

Review 7.  [Carcinogenic risk of automobile exhaust: a review].

Authors:  S Lagorio; P Vineis; P Boffetta
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.901

8.  Molecular and genetic damage in humans from environmental pollution in Poland.

Authors:  F P Perera; K Hemminki; E Gryzbowska; G Motykiewicz; J Michalska; R M Santella; T L Young; C Dickey; P Brandt-Rauf; I De Vivo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effects of ambient sulfur oxides and suspended particles on respiratory health of preadolescent children.

Authors:  J H Ware; B G Ferris; D W Dockery; J D Spengler; D O Stram; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1986-05

10.  A case-control study of lung cancer with special reference to the effect of air pollution in Poland.

Authors:  W Jedrychowski; H Becher; J Wahrendorf; Z Basa-Cierpialek
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in environmental health research.

Authors:  Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.