Literature DB >> 7569131

Staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: lessons from a learning curve.

R D Harris1, A R Schned, J A Heaney.   

Abstract

Endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most accurate noninvasive method of staging prostate cancer. However, inexperienced radiologists may lack the necessary technical and interpretative skills to use this technique, and both radiologists and referring urologists may become frustrated with this method because of its inaccuracy compared with analysis of the radical prostatectomy specimen. Meticulous pathologic correlation is necessary to evaluate endorectal MR imaging findings. The authors compare their initial experience using endorectal MR imaging for staging prostate cancer (25 cases) with their later experience (25 cases) to highlight the various diagnostic pitfalls and "pearls" one may encounter when using endorectal MR imaging. Knowledge of the pathways of tumor spread inside and outside the gland may be helpful in interpreting endorectal MR images. The authors achieved a substantial improvement in the overall staging accuracy of endorectal MR imaging by careful pathologic correlation and by considering the anatomic features of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7569131     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.15.4.7569131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.

Authors:  B Calio; A Sidana; D Sugano; S Gaur; A Jain; M Maruf; S Xu; P Yan; J Kruecker; M Merino; P Choyke; B Turkbey; B Wood; P Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  MRI evaluation of extramural vascular invasion by inexperienced radiologists.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Xiao-Ting Li; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Rui-Jia Sun; Yu-Hong Qu; Hui-Ci Zhu; Zhen Guan; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of initial and tertiary centre second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Nienke L Hansen; Brendan C Koo; Ferdia A Gallagher; Anne Y Warren; Andrew Doble; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Ola Bratt; Christof Kastner; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Impact of PI-RADS v2 on indication of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  George de Queiroz Rozas; Lucas Scatigno Saad; Homero José de Farias E Melo; Henrique Armando Azevedo Gabrielle; Jacob Szejnfeld
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  The learning curve in bladder MRI using VI-RADS assessment score during an interactive dedicated training program.

Authors:  Miguel Correia da Silva; Martina Pecoraro; Martina Lucia Pisciotti; Ailin Dehghanpour; Ali Forookhi; Sara Lucciola; Marco Bicchetti; Emanuele Messina; Carlo Catalano; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 7.034

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.