Literature DB >> 7569045

Challenges and progress in the production of transgenic cattle.

W H Eyestone1.   

Abstract

The production of transgenic cattle presents a number of unique challenges not encountered in other species. First, the survival of microinjected zygotes is low; only 15% in vivo-derived develop into morulae and blastocysts and, of these, only about 18% yield live calves. Second, transgene integration frequency is relatively low, around 3%. Thus, more than 1000 zygotes must be injected to produce a single transgenic calf. Obtaining sufficient zygotes from donor cattle to sustain a transgenic cattle programme is logistically and financially prohibitive, since the average superovulated donor yields only about four microinjectable zygotes per collection attempt. In vitro oocyte maturation and fertilization techniques may be used to alleviate this problem, although initially the developmental potential of in vitro-derived microinjected zygotes is lower than their in vivo-produced counterparts (8% v. 15%, respectively, yield morulae and blastocysts). Since only 3-5% of calves born from microinjected zygotes produced in either fashion yield transgenics, at least 20-30 pregnancies must be carried to term for every transgenic calf born. These conditions require that large herds of donor and recipient cattle be maintained. Recipient requirements could be reduced if transgene integration frequency could be increased, but improvements in the near future are unlikely since the mechanism of integration after pronuclear microinjection is poorly understood. Alternatively, embryos could be screened for integrated transgenes before transfer; however, efforts in this area have been complicated by high frequencies of false positive results. Although yet to be developed, bovine embryonic stem cells would alleviate many of these problems and permit a wider range of genetic manipulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7569045     DOI: 10.1071/rd9940647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biomedical and agricultural applications of animal transgenesis.

Authors:  Alison J Thomson; Jim McWhir
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Recent advances in transgenic technology.

Authors:  E R Cameron
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Artificial cloning of domestic animals.

Authors:  Carol L Keefer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Transgenesis in the rat and larger mammals.

Authors:  L J Mullins; J J Mullins
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Effects of AANAT overexpression on the inflammatory responses and autophagy activity in the cellular and transgenic animal levels.

Authors:  Jingli Tao; Minghui Yang; Hao Wu; Teng Ma; Changjiu He; Menglong Chai; Xiaosheng Zhang; Jinlong Zhang; Fangrong Ding; Sutian Wang; Shoulong Deng; Kuanfeng Zhu; Yukun Song; Pengyun Ji; Haijun Liu; Zhengxing Lian; Guoshi Liu
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 16.016

6.  Genome Editing in Large Animals.

Authors:  James West; W Warren Gill
Journal:  J Equine Vet Sci       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.583

7.  Low levels of exosomal-miRNAs in maternal blood are associated with early pregnancy loss in cloned cattle.

Authors:  T H C De Bem; J C da Silveira; R V Sampaio; J R Sangalli; M L F Oliveira; R M Ferreira; L A Silva; F Perecin; W A King; F V Meirelles; E S Ramos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.