Literature DB >> 7568768

Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks and interphase chromosome breaks after exposure to X rays in one normal and two hypersensitive human fibroblast cell lines.

C Badie1, G Iliakis, N Foray, G Alsbeih, B Cedervall, N Chavaudra, G Pantelias, C Arlett, E P Malaise.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to measure simultaneously and in a quantitative manner double-strand breaks (DSBs), interphase chromosome breaks and cell lethality either immediately after irradiation, or at various times thereafter (up to 24 h), in cells of three nontransformed human fibroblast cell lines of widely different intrinsic radiosensitivity. We wished to assess initial damage, repair kinetics and residual damage at the DNA and the chromosome level, and to correlate these parameters with cell killing. We employed HF19 cells, a normal fibroblast cell line, AT2 cells, a radiosensitive cell line from a patient suffering from ataxia telangiectasia (AT), and 180BR cells, a radiosensitive cell line from a patient with no clinical symptoms of AT. AT2 and 180BR cells, in addition to being radiosensitive, also display a reduced ability to repair potentially lethal damage compared to HF19 cells. The yield of DSBs, as measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, is similar in all three cell lines (slopes correspond to 1.6-1.7% Gy-1 of DNA-associated radioactivity released from the gel well into the lane). In contrast, residual DSBs measured 24 h after irradiation are almost zero for HF19 cells (0.1% confidence interval = 0-1.4%), but are 12.5% (+/- 2.3%) and 43.8% (+/- 1.2%) of those measured immediately after irradiation in AT2 and 180BR cells, respectively. Residual interphase chromosome breaks are 11.6% (+/- 1.6%), 29.7% (+/- 5.7%) and 41.4% (+/- 2.2%) of those measured immediately after irradiation in HF19, AT2 and 180BR cells, respectively. Neither the initial yield of DSBs nor that of excess interphase chromosome breaks can explain the differences in radiosensitivity between the three cell lines; however, there is a correlation between residual DSBs, rate of DSB rejoining at 24 h, residual interphase chromosome breaks on the one hand and cell survival on the other hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7568768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  16 in total

1.  DNA damage-dependent nuclear dynamics of the Mre11 complex.

Authors:  O K Mirzoeva; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  A Ku80 fragment with dominant negative activity imparts a radiosensitive phenotype to CHO-K1 cells.

Authors:  E Marangoni; N Foray; M O'Driscoll; S Douc-Rasy; J Bernier; J Bourhis; P Jeggo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Comparison of clonogenic assay with premature chromosome condensation assay in prediction of human cell radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Zhuan-Zi Wang; Wen-Jian Li; Hong Zhang; Jian-She Yang; Rong Qiu; Xiao Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  hMre11 and hRad50 nuclear foci are induced during the normal cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  R S Maser; K J Monsen; B E Nelms; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  TIP49b, a regulator of activating transcription factor 2 response to stress and DNA damage.

Authors:  S G Cho; A Bhoumik; L Broday; V Ivanov; B Rosenstein; Z Ronai
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Molecular analysis of base damage clustering associated with a site-specific radiation-induced DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Kamal Datta; Pawel Jaruga; Miral Dizdaroglu; Ronald D Neumann; Thomas A Winters
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Radiobiological Characterization of Tuberous Sclerosis: a Delay in the Nucleo-Shuttling of ATM May Be Responsible for Radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Mélanie L Ferlazzo; Mohamed Kheir Eddine Bach-Tobdji; Amar Djerad; Laurène Sonzogni; Clément Devic; Adeline Granzotto; Larry Bodgi; Jean-Thomas Bachelet; Assia Djefal-Kerrar; Christophe Hennequin; Nicolas Foray
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Genetic evidence for the involvement of DNA ligase IV in the DNA-PK-dependent pathway of non-homologous end joining in mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Wang; Z C Zeng; A R Perrault; X Cheng; W Qin; G Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Influence of Confounding Factors on Radiation Dose Estimation Using In Vivo Validated Transcriptional Biomarkers.

Authors:  Lourdes Cruz-Garcia; Grainne O'Brien; Ellen Donovan; Lone Gothard; Sue Boyle; Antoine Laval; Isabelle Testard; Lucyna Ponge; Grzegorz Woźniak; Leszek Miszczyk; Serge M Candéias; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Piotr Widlak; Navita Somaiah; Christophe Badie
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Characterization of complex apurinic/apyrimidinic-site clustering associated with an authentic site-specific radiation-induced DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Kamal Datta; Ronald D Neumann; Thomas A Winters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.