Literature DB >> 7568675

The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules.

R Henderson1.   

Abstract

Radiation damage is the main problem which prevents the determination of the structure of a single biological macromolecule at atomic resolution using any kind of microscopy. This is true whether neutrons, electrons or X-rays are used as the illumination. For neutrons, the cross-section for nuclear capture and the associated energy deposition and radiation damage could be reduced by using samples that are fully deuterated and 15N-labelled and by using fast neutrons, but single molecule biological microscopy is still not feasible. For naturally occurring biological material, electrons at present provide the most information for a given amount of radiation damage. Using phase contrast electron microscopy on biological molecules and macromolecular assemblies of approximately 10(5) molecular weight and above, there is in theory enough information present in the image to allow determination of the position and orientation of individual particles: the application of averaging methods can then be used to provide an atomic resolution structure. The images of approximately 10,000 particles are required. Below 10(5) molecular weight, some kind of crystal or other geometrically ordered aggregate is necessary to provide a sufficiently high combined molecular weight to allow for the alignment. In practice, the present quality of the best images still falls short of that attainable in theory and this means that a greater number of particles must be averaged and that the molecular weight limitation is somewhat larger than the predicted limit. For X-rays, the amount of damage per useful elastic scattering event is several hundred times greater than for electrons at all wavelengths and energies and therefore the requirements on specimen size and number of particles are correspondingly larger. Because of the lack of sufficiently bright neutron sources in the foreseeable future, electron microscopy in practice provides the greatest potential for immediate progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7568675     DOI: 10.1017/s003358350000305x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biophys        ISSN: 0033-5835            Impact factor:   5.318


  266 in total

Review 1.  Adding the third dimension to virus life cycles: three-dimensional reconstruction of icosahedral viruses from cryo-electron micrographs.

Authors:  T S Baker; N H Olson; S D Fuller
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  The three-dimensional structure of halorhodopsin to 5 A by electron crystallography: A new unbending procedure for two-dimensional crystals by using a global reference structure.

Authors:  E R Kunji; S von Gronau; D Oesterhelt; R Henderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Synchrotron radiation diffraction from two-dimensional protein crystals at the air/water interface.

Authors:  P F Lenne; B Berge; A Renault; C Zakri; C Vénien-Bryan; S Courty; F Balavoine; W Bergsma-Schutter; A Brisson; G Grübel; N Boudet; O Konovalov; J F Legrand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Structural biology.

Authors:  K C Holmes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Solution x-ray scattering-based estimation of electron cryomicroscopy imaging parameters for reconstruction of virus particles.

Authors:  P A Thuman-Commike; H Tsuruta; B Greene; P E Prevelige; J King; W Chiu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Shake-up and shake-off excitations with associated electron losses in X-ray studies of proteins.

Authors:  P Persson; S Lunell; A Szöke; B Ziaja; J Hajdu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  An approach to three-dimensional structures of biomolecules by using single-molecule diffraction images.

Authors:  J Miao; K O Hodgson; D Sayre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Two-dimensional crystal structures of protein kinase C-delta, its regulatory domain, and the enzyme complexed with myelin basic protein.

Authors:  Alexander S Solodukhin; Heather L Caldwell; Julianne J Sando; Robert H Kretsinger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Subnanometre-resolution electron cryomicroscopy structure of a heterodimeric ABC exporter.

Authors:  JungMin Kim; Shenping Wu; Thomas M Tomasiak; Claudia Mergel; Michael B Winter; Sebastian B Stiller; Yaneth Robles-Colmanares; Robert M Stroud; Robert Tampé; Charles S Craik; Yifan Cheng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Structure of thermally activated TRP channels.

Authors:  Matthew R Cohen; Vera Y Moiseenkova-Bell
Journal:  Curr Top Membr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.049

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.