Literature DB >> 7568644

Time and frequency domain methods for heart rate variability analysis: a methodological comparison.

D A Litvack1, T F Oberlander, L H Carney, J P Saul.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analytically evaluate and compare two of the most common methods for measuring respiration-related heart rate fluctuations: linear detrended heart rate power spectral analysis and the Porges technique of filtered variance. Low-frequency power was removed from instantaneous 4-Hz R-R interval signals using either a first-order linear (linear/spectral technique) or a third-order polynomial (MPF-var technique). The signals were band-pass filtered and analyzed in both the time and frequency domains. Although in most cases the two techniques yielded substantially similar results, the MPF-var technique resulted in signal amplification at a few specific frequencies. The frequency range and effect to amplification of the MPF-var technique were dependent upon the polynomial size, sampling frequency, and frequency content of the signal.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7568644     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  18 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in the social networks of young and older adults: prediction of mental health and cardiovascular reactivity during acute stress.

Authors:  B N Uchino; J Holt-Lunstad; D Uno; J B Flinders
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-08

2.  The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck third-order Gaussian process (OUGP) applied directly to the un-resampled heart rate variability (HRV) tachogram for detrending and low-pass filtering.

Authors:  A C Fisher; A Eleuteri; D Groves; C J Dewhurst
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  An emotion coaching parenting intervention for families exposed to intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Lynn Fainsilber Katz; Kyrill Gurtovenko; Ashley Maliken; Nicole Stettler; Joy Kawamura; Kaitlyn Fladeboe
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2020-03

4.  Self-compassion training modulates alpha-amylase, heart rate variability, and subjective responses to social evaluative threat in women.

Authors:  Joanna J Arch; Kirk Warren Brown; Derek J Dean; Lauren N Landy; Kimberley D Brown; Mark L Laudenslager
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.905

5.  Family stress moderates relations between physiological and behavioral synchrony and child self-regulation in mother-preschooler dyads.

Authors:  Cynthia Suveg; Anne Shaffer; Molly Davis
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Subliminal activation of social ties moderates cardiovascular reactivity during acute stress.

Authors:  McKenzie Carlisle; Bert N Uchino; David M Sanbonmatsu; Timothy W Smith; Matthew R Cribbet; Wendy Birmingham; Kathleen C Light; Allison A Vaughn
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  A Within-Subject Normal-Mixture Model with Mixed-Effects for Analyzing Heart Rate Variability.

Authors:  Jessica M Ketchum; Al M Best; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2012

8.  Cardiovascular reactivity during positive and negative marital interactions.

Authors:  Jill B Nealey-Moore; Timothy W Smith; Bert N Uchino; Melissa W Hawkins; Chrisana Olson-Cerny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-09-21

9.  Conflict and collaboration in middle-aged and older couples: II. Cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction.

Authors:  Timothy W Smith; Bert N Uchino; Cynthia A Berg; Paul Florsheim; Gale Pearce; Melissa Hawkins; Nancy J M Henry; Ryan M Beveridge; Michelle A Skinner; Kelly J Ko; Chrisanna Olsen-Cerny
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-06

10.  Preschoolers' psychophysiological responses to mood induction tasks moderate the intergenerational transmission of internalizing problems.

Authors:  Molly Davis; Cynthia Suveg; Monica Whitehead; Anna Jones; Anne Shaffer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.