Literature DB >> 7566525

Target point calculation in the computerized tomography. Comparison of different stereotactic methods.

P Grunert1, J Mäurer.   

Abstract

The adaptation of computerized tomography for stereotactic operations requires the transformation of the coordinates of the target point from the CT image space into the stereotactic frame space. Two basic solutions for this transformation are realized in the most of the contemporary stereotactical systems. The indirect geometric method adjusts the frame coordinate system mechanically and identifies its origin in the CT image. There are 6 degrees of freedom: 3 of rotation and 3 of translation which have to be taken into consideration. The second method is a based on direct algebraic coordinate transformation and is independent of the explicite knowledge of the relationship between the image and the frame space. A localization frame serves to determine a transformation matrix which, applied to any point in the image, transforms the coordinates directly into the frame coordinate system. Only the algebraic method is independent of the position of the patient in the gantry. All other methods require high mechanical precision of the alignment and stability for the CT table.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7566525     DOI: 10.1007/BF00416472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  26 in total

1.  A simple system for image directed stereotaxis.

Authors:  J E Dervin; J Miles
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Stereotactic localization (with computerized tomographic scanning), biopsy, and radiofrequency treatment of deep brain lesions.

Authors:  C A Gleason; B L Wise; B Feinstein
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  A simple and inexpensive method for CT-guided stereotaxy.

Authors:  K Wester; O Sortland; E Hauglie-Hanssen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  CT-guided stereotactic biopsies using a modified frame and Gildenberg techniques.

Authors:  D E Bullard; B S Nashold; D Osborne; P C Burger; P Dubois
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Computed tomography/guided stereotactic surgery: conception and development of a new stereotactic methodology.

Authors:  J H Perry; A E Rosenbaum; L D Lunsford; C A Swink; D S Zorub
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Stereotactic computer tomography with a modified Riechert-Mundinger device as the basis for integrated stereotactic neuroradiological investigations.

Authors:  V Sturm; O Pastyr; W Schlegel; H Scharfenberg; H J Zabel; G Netzeband; S Schabbert; W Berberich
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Stereotaxic frame and computer software for CT-directed neurosurgical localization.

Authors:  R A Brown; T S Roberts; A G Osborn
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Head fixation system for integration of radiodiagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Authors:  T Greitz; M Bergström; J Boëthius; D Kingsley; T Ribbe
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Stereotactic guided biopsy in the computerized tomographic scanner.

Authors:  R G Rushworth
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1980-12

10.  An adapter for computed tomography-guided stereotaxis.

Authors:  L V Laitinen; B Liliequist; M Fagerlund; A T Eriksson
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1985-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.