Literature DB >> 7566147

Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups.

S A Frank1.   

Abstract

Evolutionary theory has not explained how competition among lower level units is suppressed in the formation of higher-level evolutionary units. For example, the key problem of early evolution is small, individual replicators formed cooperative groups of sufficient complexity to allow accurate copying of the genetic material. The puzzle is why parasites did not subvert the formation of cells by obtaining benefits from the group without contributing to shared traits that enhance reproduction. These parasites would outcompete other replicators within the cell, disrupting reproductive fairness among subunits and destroying the functional coherence of the group. A similar problem arose at a later evolutionary stage with the orderly mendelian segregation of subunits (chromosomes) within cells, and reproductive fairness continued to be a problem in the evolution of insect and human societies. Here I present a simple model to show how reproductive fairness evolves among subunits to create functional coherence and higher-level units. Self-restraint, which evolves according to the kin-selection coefficient of relatedness, is not sufficient: mutual policing and enforcement of reproductive fairness are also required for the evolution of increasing social complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7566147     DOI: 10.1038/377520a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  73 in total

Review 1.  Origin of sex revisited.

Authors:  Mauro Santos; Elias Zintzaras; Eörs Szathmáry
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  The social evolution of bacterial pathogenesis.

Authors:  J Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Worker policing without genetic conflicts in a clonal ant.

Authors:  A Hartmann; J Wantia; J A Torres; J Heinze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Unfavourable environment limits social conflict in Yuhina brunneiceps.

Authors:  Sheng-Feng Shen; Sandra L Vehrencamp; Rufus A Johnstone; Hsiang-Ching Chen; Shih-Fan Chan; Wen-Yi Liao; Kai-Yin Lin; Hsiao-Wei Yuan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Family feuds: social competition and sexual conflict in complex societies.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons.

Authors:  Karl Sigmund; Hannelore De Silva; Arne Traulsen; Christoph Hauert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Workers influence royal reproduction.

Authors:  Richard J Gill; Robert L Hammond
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evidence for competition and cooperation among climbing plants.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Relatedness predicts multiple measures of investment in cooperative nest construction in sociable weavers.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton; Sebastian Echeverri; Dirk Heinrich; Holger Kolberg
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.