Literature DB >> 7565153

Costs of intrapartum care in a midwife-managed delivery unit and a consultant-led labour ward.

V A Hundley, C Donaldson, G D Lang, F M Cruickshank, C M Glazener, J M Milne, J Mollison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to investigate whether there are differences between the cost of intrapartum care for women at low obstetric risk in a midwife-managed labour and delivery unit and that in a consultant-led labour and delivery ward.
DESIGN: cost analysis based on the findings of a randomised controlled trial comparing two alternative types of intrapartum care.
SETTING: Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Grampian.
SUBJECTS: the number of women 'booked' for care in the Midwives' Unit in a standard year and a comparable group of women cared for in the consultant-led labour ward. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: the cost 'outcome' is the extra (or reduced) cost per woman resulting from the introduction of a midwife-managed delivery unit.
FINDINGS: the baseline extra cost of the introduction of the Midwives' Unit was found to be 40.71 pounds per woman. Depending on the scenario used, this ranged from a cost saving of 9.74 pounds per woman to an additional cost of 44.23 pounds per woman.
CONCLUSIONS: this study has shown that, in terms of costs incurred during the intrapartum period, the marginal cost of caring for women at low obstetric risk alongside women at high obstetric risk in a standard labour ward is small. However, the impact of establishing a separate midwife-managed delivery unit, requiring an increase in midwifery staffing levels, can be significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7565153     DOI: 10.1016/0266-6138(95)90024-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  6 in total

Review 1.  Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Soo Downe; Denis Walsh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

2.  Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help?

Authors:  Della A Forster; Michelle Newton; Helen L McLachlan; Karen Willis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vanessa Scarf; Christine Catling; Rosalie Viney; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Marijke Jc Hendrix; Silvia Maa Evers; Marloes Cm Basten; Jan G Nijhuis; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

6.  Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.

Authors:  Marit Hitzert; Marieke Maa Hermus; Inge Ic Boesveld; Arie Franx; Karin Km van der Pal-de Bruin; Eric Eap Steegers; EIske Me van den Akker-van Marle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.