Literature DB >> 756464

Unlimited volumes of laboratory data: a confusing and diagnostically deceptive product of modern technology.

R R Grams, D Lezotte.   

Abstract

The large volumes of laboratory data currently available in clinical practice can lead to erroneous conclusions. Our current statistical interpretation of these data is univariate (one variable at a time) and often not age- and sex-corrected. Using an optimal technique of multivariate analysis, a SMAC profile of 19 tests performed on normal subjects resulted in over a 500% improvement in defining the reference range. Using physiologic subsets of the SMAC profile for patients, improvements in interpretation of between 100% and 300% are possible. Results indicate a serious clinical problem that will require modification of laboratory reports using modern technology as an adjunct for diagnostic medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 756464     DOI: 10.1007/bf02221900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  7 in total

1.  Current concepts of "normal values," "reference values," and "discrimination values," in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  F W Sunderman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  New concepts in the design of a clinical laboratory information system (LIS).

Authors:  R R Grams; E L Pastor
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Clinical decision analysis. The hazard of using additional data.

Authors:  J C Sisson; E B Schoomaker; J C Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Judgment based on 95 per cent confidence limits: a statistical dilemma involving multitest screening and proficiency testing of multiple specimens.

Authors:  I Schoen; S H Brooks
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Health, normality, and the ghost of Gauss.

Authors:  L R Elveback; C L Guillier; F R Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1970-01-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A proposal for laboratory data reporting.

Authors:  R R Grams
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Determining clinical significance in repeated laboratory measurements. The "Clinical Delta Range".

Authors:  D Lezotte; R R Grams
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.460

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  A proposal for laboratory data reporting.

Authors:  R R Grams
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Establishing a multivariate clinical laboratory data base.

Authors:  R R Grams; D Lezotte; J C Gudat
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  The role of modeling methods in medical diagnosis.

Authors:  D Lezotte; P A Scheinok
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.