Literature DB >> 7564394

Learning and evolution: a quantitative genetics approach.

R W Anderson1.   

Abstract

Recent models of the interactions between learning and evolution show that learning increases the rate at which populations find optima in fixed environments. However, learning ability is only advantageous in variable environments. In this study, quantitative genetics models are used to investigate the effects of individual learning on evolution. Two models of populations of learning individuals are constructed and analyzed. In the first model, the effect of learning is represented as an increase in the variance of selection. Dynamical equations and equilibrium conditions are derived for a population of learning individuals under fixed and variable environmental selection. In the second model, the amount of individual learning effort is regulated by a second gene specifying the duration of a critical learning period. The second model includes a model of the learning process to determine the individual fitness costs and benefits accrued during the learning period. Individuals are then selected for the optimal learning investment. The similarities of the results from these two models suggest that the net effects of learning on evolution are relatively independent of the mechanisms underlying the learning process.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7564394     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  Components of change in the evolution of learning and unlearned preference.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; David W Stephens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Phenotypic and genomic plasticity of alternative male reproductive tactics in sailfin mollies.

Authors:  Bonnie A Fraser; Ilana Janowitz; Margaret Thairu; Joseph Travis; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  An equilibrium for phenotypic variance in fluctuating environments owing to epigenetics.

Authors:  Oana Carja; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Biomimetic molecular design tools that learn, evolve, and adapt.

Authors:  David A Winkler
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.883

6.  Phenotypic heterogeneity in modeling cancer evolution.

Authors:  Ali Mahdipour-Shirayeh; Kamran Kaveh; Mohammad Kohandel; Sivabal Sivaloganathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Influence of learning on range expansion and adaptation to novel habitats.

Authors:  M Sutter; T J Kawecki
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  The evolution of trait correlations constrains phenotypic adaptation to high CO2 in a eukaryotic alga.

Authors:  Nathan G Walworth; Jana Hinners; Phoebe A Argyle; Suzana G Leles; Martina A Doblin; Sinéad Collins; Naomi M Levine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  How Adaptive Learning Affects Evolution: Reviewing Theory on the Baldwin Effect.

Authors:  B Sznajder; M W Sabelis; M Egas
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 3.119

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.