Literature DB >> 7564295

Measuring ethanol in saliva with the QED enzymatic test device: comparison of results with blood- and breath-alcohol concentrations.

A W Jones1.   

Abstract

An enzymatic test device, QED (quantitative ethanol detector), intended for on-the-spot analysis of ethanol not equal to saliva was evaluated in laboratory experiments. Tests were made in vitro with known-strength aqueous ethanol standards and also in vivo after healthy volunteers drank a moderate dose of alcohol (0.80 g/kg), either on an empty stomach or after breakfast. Acetone, methanol, 2-butanone, and ethylene glycol did not react with the QED when tested in vitro. However, n-propanol (100 mg/dL) gave an apparent ethanol response of 60 mg/dL; the secondary alcohol, 2-propanol (100 mg/dL), gave a response of 20 mg/dL, but a longer time was needed to reach an endpoint. When ethanol solutions of 50, 100, and 140 mg/dL were analyzed, the QED gave readings of 50 +/- 2 (+/- standard deviation [SD]), 102 +/- 3, and 136 +/- 5, corresponding to recoveries of 100, 102, and 97%, respectively. The analytical precision, expressed as coefficients of variation, ranged from 3.2-4.0%. The mean difference between the QED test result and venous blood ethanol was 4.4 +/- 0.91 mg/dL (+/- standard error [SE]), and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were -18 and 26 mg/dL. The QED saliva test also compared well with breath-alcohol readings; the mean difference was 3.3 +/- 0.71 mg/dL, and the 95% LOA were now slightly narrower: -12 and 19 mg/dL. The QED device proved useful for quickly analyzing alcohol in saliva, and the results agreed well with the concentrations of ethanol in venous blood and end-expired breath.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7564295     DOI: 10.1093/jat/19.3.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  3 in total

1.  Saliva alcohol concentrations in accident and emergency attendances.

Authors:  T Simpson; N Murphy; D F Peck
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Drug testing in oral fluid.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  Poor correlation between alcohol concentration in oral fluid and breath in subjects consuming beverages immediately before testing.

Authors:  Hallvard Gjerde; Anne Line Bretteville-Jensen; Håvard Furuhaugen
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.