Literature DB >> 7563069

Sequence determinants for -2 frameshift mutagenesis at NarI-derived hot spots.

N Koffel-Schwartz1, R P Fuchs.   

Abstract

The recognition sequence of the NarI restriction enzyme is known to be a strong hot spot for -2 frameshift mutations (G1G2CG3CC-->GGCC) induced by the chemical carcinogen N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF). In an attempt to define a "consensus sequence" for this mutation hot spot, we have investigated the role of the bases flanking the central dinucleotide GpC repeat in the NarI sequence (NaGCGCNb) on the mutation frequency induced by the carcinogen. Construction and random modification with AAF of the 16 plasmids resulting from the replacement of Na and Nb by A,T,G and C, respectively, have been undertaken. All 16 sequences tested are found to be -2 frameshift mutation hot spots. Indeed, a level of modification of approximately five AAF adducts per plasmid molecule induces a mutation frequency ranging between 500 and 5000-fold above background. The mutations observed are mainly (90%) deletion of a dinucleotide CpG in the targeted sequence NaGCGCNb. Previous studies on NarI mutagenesis (G1G2CG3CC-->GGCC) have shown that only AAF adducts at G3 in the template for lagging strand synthesis induce -2 frameshift mutagenesis at a high level. When the mutation data obtained in this work are analyzed as originating essentially from adducts to guanines in this strand, we find that it is the nucleotide Nb located 3' to the central dinucleotide GpC repeat that strongly modulates the mutation frequency, while the nucleotide Na located on the 5' side has little effect. Our present model of frameshift mutagenesis at NarI sites involves a template-primer misalignment step with a two-nucleotide slipped mutagenic intermediate. In the context of this model, the modulation of mutagenesis by nucleotide Nb located two nucleotides 3' from the putative adduct site in the template strand can be explained in view of the fact that the replication complex encounters this nucleotide before it encounters the adduct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7563069     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  14 in total

1.  Lesion bypass DNA polymerases replicate across non-DNA segments.

Authors:  Ayelet Maor-Shoshani; Vered Ben-Ari; Zvi Livneh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Translesion synthesis past the C8- and N2-deoxyguanosine adducts of the dietary mutagen 2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the NarI recognition sequence by prokaryotic DNA polymerases.

Authors:  James S Stover; Goutam Chowdhury; Hong Zang; F Peter Guengerich; Carmelo J Rizzo
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  SOS factors involved in translesion synthesis.

Authors:  R L Napolitano; I B Lambert; R P Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Base-displaced intercalated structure of the food mutagen 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the recognition sequence of the NarI restriction enzyme, a hotspot for -2 bp deletions.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Nicholas E DeMuro; C Eric Elmquist; James S Stover; Carmelo J Rizzo; Michael P Stone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis.

Authors:  R Napolitano; R Janel-Bintz; J Wagner; R P Fuchs
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Conformational Insights into the Mechanism of Acetylaminofluorene-dG-Induced Frameshift Mutations in the NarI Mutational Hotspot.

Authors:  Lifang Xu; Bongsup P Cho
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Structure and thermodynamic insights on acetylaminofluorene-modified deletion DNA duplexes as models for frameshift mutagenesis.

Authors:  Anusha Sandineni; Bin Lin; Alexander D MacKerell; Bongsup P Cho
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Inactivation of DNA proofreading obviates the need for SOS induction in frameshift mutagenesis.

Authors:  R P Fuchs; R L Napolitano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Probing the sequence effects on NarI-induced -2 frameshift mutagenesis by dynamic 19F NMR, UV, and CD spectroscopy.

Authors:  Nidhi Jain; Yuyuan Li; Li Zhang; Srinivasa R Meneni; Bongsup P Cho
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  DNA sequence modulates the conformation of the food mutagen 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline in the recognition sequence of the NarI restriction enzyme.

Authors:  Feng Wang; C Eric Elmquist; James S Stover; Carmelo J Rizzo; Michael P Stone
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.