Thermodynamic mapping of the inhibitor site of the aspartic protease endothiapepsin.

The discovery that the protease from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) belongs to the aspartic protease family has generated renewed interest in this class of proteins. In this paper, the interactions of endothiapepsin, an aspartic proteinase from the fungus Endothia parasitica, with the inhibitor pepstatin A have been studied by high-sensitivity calorimetric techniques. These experiments have permitted a complete characterization of the temperature and pH-dependence of the binding energetics. The binding reaction is characterized by negative intrinsic binding enthalpy and negative heat capacity changes. The association constant is maximal at low pH (2 x 10(9) M-1 at pH 3) but decreases upon increasing pH (8.1 x 10(6) M-1 at pH 7). The binding of the inhibitor is coupled to the protonation of one of the aspartic moieties in the Asp dyad of the catalytic site of the protein. This phenomenon is responsible for the decrease in the apparent affinity of the inhibitor for the enzyme upon increasing pH. The experimental results presented here indicate that the binding of the inhibitor is favored both enthalpically and entropically. While the favorable enthalpic contribution is intuitively expected, the favorable entropic contribution is due to the large gain in solvent-related entropy associated with the burial of a large hydrophobic surface, that overcompensates the loss in conformational and translational/rotational degrees of freedom upon complex formation. The characteristics of the molecular recognition process have been evaluated by means of structure-based thermodynamic analysis. Three regions in the protein contribute significantly to the free energy of binding: the residues surrounding the Asp dyad (Asp32 in the N-terminal lobe and Asp215 in the C-terminal domain) and the flap region (Ile73 to Asp77). In addition, the rearrangement of residues that are not in immediate contact with the inhibitor provides close to 40% of the protease contribution to the binding free energy. On the other hand, the two statine residues provide more than half of the inhibitor contributions to the total free energy of binding. It is demonstrated that a previously developed empirical structural parametrization of the thermodynamic parameters that define the Gibbs energy, accurately accounts for the binding energetics and its temperature and pH-dependence.