Literature DB >> 7562623

Effect of vibration on antagonist muscle coactivation during progressive fatigue in humans.

C Rothmuller1, E Cafarelli.   

Abstract

1. Biceps femoris antagonist coactivation increases during progressive fatigue. Our purpose was to determine if the mechanism that increases coactivation during fatigue is susceptible to vibration. Vibration drives alpha-motoneurons via the Ia loop, producing force without descending motor drive, and thus uncoupling antagonist and agonist activation. Evidence that vibration increases coactivation disproportionately from its 'common drive' would suggest the possibility that some of the effects of fatigue are mediated through a segmental reflex loop. 2. Ten male subjects performed repeated maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVCs) of the knee extensors of one leg. Paired submaximal test contractions (50% of MVC), without visual feedback, were performed when MVC reached 85, 70 and then 50% of its initial value. Vibration was applied to the patellar tendon during one test contraction in each pair. 3. Vibration reduced test contraction force below control values. However, coactivation increased at the same rate in both conditions. Biceps femoris coactivation was greater during vibration, but did not change during fatigue in either condition. 4. Our observations suggest that agonist-antagonist muscle pairs are controlled as a single motor unit pool by a common central drive. Vibrating the agonist increases antagonist coactivity, but does not alter the rate at which coactivation increases during fatigue. This supports the idea that agonist coactivation is controlled by a central mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7562623      PMCID: PMC1158050          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  21 in total

Review 1.  MUSCLE SPINDLES AND THEIR MOTOR CONTROL.

Authors:  P B MATTHEWS
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; K E Hagbarth; H E Torebjörk; B G Wallin
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction.

Authors:  D Burke; K E Hagbarth; L Löfstedt; B G Wallin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Transmission in the pathway of reciprocal Ia inhibition to motoneurones and its control during the tonic stretch reflex.

Authors:  H Hultborn
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Antagonist muscle activity during rapid arm movements: central versus proprioceptive influences.

Authors:  R W Angel
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Constant-effort contractions related to the electromyogram.

Authors:  W S Cain; J C Stevens
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1973

7.  Effect of muscle tendon vibration on the perception of force.

Authors:  L A Jones; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 8.  The coactivation of antagonist muscles.

Authors:  A M Smith
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Effect of vibration on static force sensation in man.

Authors:  E Cafarelli; C E Kostka
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Normal variability of tonic vibration reflexes in man.

Authors:  G Eklund; K E Hagbarth
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  23 in total

1.  Task failure during standing heel raises is associated with increased power from 13 to 50 Hz in the activation of triceps surae.

Authors:  Rafael Pereira; Ludmila Schettino; Marco Machado; Pierre Augusto Victor da Silva; Osmar Pinto Neto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Fatigue-induced adjustment in antagonist coactivation by old adults during a steadiness task.

Authors:  Christopher J Arellano; David Caha; Joseph E Hennessey; Ioannis G Amiridis; Stéphane Baudry; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-02-04

3.  Acute whole body vibration training increases vertical jump and flexibility performance in elite female field hockey players.

Authors:  D J Cochrane; S R Stannard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  Is fatigue all in your head? A critical review of the central governor model.

Authors:  J P Weir; T W Beck; J T Cramer; T J Housh
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  The potential neural mechanisms of acute indirect vibration.

Authors:  Darryl J Cochrane
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Vibration as an exercise modality: how it may work, and what its potential might be.

Authors:  Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Cold application for neuromuscular recovery following intense lower-body exercise.

Authors:  Monique Pointon; Rob Duffield; Jack Cannon; Frank E Marino
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Tendon vibration during submaximal isometric strength and postural tasks.

Authors:  S I Spiliopoulou; I G Amiridis; V Hatzitaki; D Patikas; E Kellis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Muscle fatigue and electromyographic changes are not different in women and men matched for strength.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzikotoulas; Theophanis Siatras; Elma Spyropoulou; Ilias Paraschos; Dimitrios Patikas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Efficiency of vibration exercise for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Klaus Baum; Tim Votteler; Jürgen Schiab
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.