Literature DB >> 7562149

Distal femoral nonunion: treatment with a retrograde inserted locked intramedullary nail.

K J Koval1, D Seligson, H Rosen, K Fee.   

Abstract

Between March 1989 and August 1993, 16 distal femoral nonunions (16 patients) were treated using the supracondylar intramedullary nail. The time between the initial event and retrograde nailing averaged 33 months. The nonunion level was infraisthmal in four patients and supracondylar in 12. Operative technique involved retrograde insertion of a reamed supracondylar intramedullary nail through the intercondylar notch. Follow-up was available on all patients and averaged 20 months (range 9-46). Four nonunions (25%) united with a single surgery at an average of 17 months. A fifth nonunion united at 21 months after nail dynamization and subsequent nail breakage. The nonunions of two additional patients united after exchange of a broken retrograde nail. Additional surgical procedures were performed in six of the remaining nine patients in an attempt to gain union. At an average follow-up of 16 months (range 9-23), none of the nine had united. Nine nails fractured at an average of 11 months, all through a screw hole near the nonunion. Based on these results, we cannot recommend use of the supracondylar intramedullary nail in its present form for the treatment of distal femoral nonunions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7562149     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199509040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  13 in total

1.  [Management of metaphyseal nonunions of the femur with retrograde nailing].

Authors:  R Biber; H-W Stedtfeld
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Nonunions around the knee joint.

Authors:  Daniel B Chan; Devon M Jeffcoat; Dean G Lorich; David L Helfet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly. Results with the retrograde intramedullary supracondylar nail.

Authors:  H M Janzing; F Vaes; G Van Damme; B Stockman; P L Broos
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1998-04

4.  Retrograde dynamic locked intramedullary nailing for aseptic supracondylar femoral nonunion after dynamic condylar screw treatment.

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Wu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-17

5.  Failed intramedullary nailing of femur: open reduction and plate augmentation with the nail in situ.

Authors:  Galal Zaki Said; Hatem G Said; Mohammad M el-Sharkawi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Treatment of resistant nonunion of supracondylar fractures femur by megaprosthesis.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Ajay Pal Singh; Rohit Hasija; Arun Pal Singh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures results in high union rate.

Authors:  Samantha Nino; Joshua A Parry; Frank R Avilucea; George J Haidukewych; Joshua R Langford
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-08

8.  Addition of a Medial Locking Plate to an In Situ Lateral Locking Plate Results in Healing of Distal Femoral Nonunions.

Authors:  Michael A Holzman; Bryan D Hanus; John W Munz; Daniel P O'Connor; Mark R Brinker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Do successful surgical results after operative treatment of long-bone nonunions correlate with outcomes?

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Konrad Gruson; Allison B Spitzer; Michael Walsh; Nirmal C Tejwani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Patellar tendon ossification after retrograde intramedullary nailing for distal femoral shaft fracture: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Lei Tan; Tiejun Wang; Yan-Hui Li; Tianye Yang; Baohui Hao; Dong Zhu; Da-Hui Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.