Literature DB >> 7561984

Are self-reports of smoking rate biased? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

R C Klesges1, M Debon, J W Ray.   

Abstract

This study determined evidence for digit preference in self-reports of smoking in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II). Subjects were 4275 adult smokers. Self-reports of smoking showed a marked degree of digit preference, with the vast majority of smokers reporting in multiples of 10 cigarettes per day. When number per day was compared to an objective measure of smoking exposure (carboxyhemoglobin; n = 2070) the distribution was found to be significantly assymetrical. Analysis of the distribution of COHb and various levels of number per day indicates that the differences in distribution are not due to variability in COHb. Heavier smokers, Caucasians, and those with less education were more likely to report a digit preference than lighter smokers. African-Americans, and those with more education. Results suggest that self-reports of number of cigarettes per day may be biased towards round numbers (particularly 20 cigarettes per day). Implications for assessment of smoking behavior are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7561984     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00020-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  46 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking, illicit drug use, and routes of administration among heroin and cocaine users.

Authors:  P T Harrell; R C Trenz; M Scherer; L R Pacek; W W Latimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Associations of Cigarettes Smoked Per Day with Biomarkers of Exposure Among U.S. Adult Cigarette Smokers in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 1 (2013-2014).

Authors:  Brian L Rostron; Catherine G Corey; Joanne T Chang; Dana M van Bemmel; Mollie E Miller; Cindy M Chang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with Type 2 diabetes and additional atherogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Yasuaki Hayashino; Sizuko Nagata-Kobayashi; Takeshi Morimoto; Kenji Maeda; Takuro Shimbo; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Are these emergency department performance data real?

Authors:  T E Locker; S M Mason
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Adjusting for subgroup differences in extreme response tendency in ratings of health care: impact on disparity estimates.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; David E Kanouse; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A Comparison of Direct and Indirect Analytical Approaches to Measuring Total Nicotine Equivalents in Urine.

Authors:  Taraneh Taghavi; Maria Novalen; Caryn Lerman; Tony P George; Rachel F Tyndale
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A method comparison study of timeline followback and ecological momentary assessment of daily cigarette consumption.

Authors:  Sandra D Griffith; Saul Shiffman; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Truth and Memory: Linking Instantaneous and Retrospective Self-Reported Cigarette Consumption.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Saul Shiffman; Sandra D Griffith; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Salivary cotinine concentrations in daily smokers in Barcelona, Spain: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marcela Fu; Esteve Fernandez; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; José A Pascual; Anna Schiaffino; Antoni Agudo; Carles Ariza; Josep M Borràs; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence vs heavy smoking index in a general population survey.

Authors:  M Pérez-Ríos; M I Santiago-Pérez; B Alonso; A Malvar; X Hervada; J de Leon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.