Literature DB >> 7561711

Neonatal circumcision: associated factors and length of hospital stay.

C J Mansfield1, W J Hueston, M Rudy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the efficacy of routine neonatal circumcision of male infants. Little is known about parental or provider characteristics or the use of medical resources associated with this procedure.
METHODS: Records of 3703 male infants born during 1990 and 1991 at four US sites were analyzed to discern associations between circumcision and the above factors. Analyses were limited to healthy infants.
RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of the infants in the study population were circumcised. White and African-American male infants were much more likely to be circumcised than those of other races (odds ratios [ORs], 7.3 and 7.1, respectively, P < .001). Compared with self-pay patients, those covered by private insurance were 2.5 times more likely to be circumcised (P < .001). Logistic regression showed that rates for obstetricians and family physicians were not significantly different. Increased odds of circumcision were found if the mother received an episiotomy (OR = 1.9, P < .001) or cesarean section (OR = 2.1, P < .001). Circumcised infants stayed in the hospital an average of one fourth of a day longer than did those who were not circumcised (mean difference, 0.26 days; 95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: Mother's insurance status and race as well as surgical interventions during delivery are related to circumcision. Associations with episiotomy and cesarean section suggest physician and/or parental preference for interventional approaches to health care. Generalizing the difference in hospital length of stay to the United States suggests an annual cost between $234 million and $527 million beyond charges for the procedure itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7561711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  7 in total

Review 1.  Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review.

Authors:  Gregorio A Millett; John L Peterson; Richard J Wolitski; Ron Stall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation.

Authors:  Dawn K Smith; Allan Taylor; Peter H Kilmarx; Patrick Sullivan; Lee Warner; Mary Kamb; Naomi Bock; Bos Kohmescher; Timothy D Mastro
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Male circumcision for prevention of HIV transmission: what the new data mean for HIV prevention in the United States.

Authors:  Patrick S Sullivan; Peter H Kilmarx; Thomas A Peterman; Allan W Taylor; Allyn K Nakashima; Mary L Kamb; Lee Warner; Timothy D Mastro
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 4.  How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe; Michelle R Storms
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2011-02-11

Review 5.  Exposé of misleading claims that male circumcision will increase HIV infections in Africa.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Ronald H Gray; Daniel T Halperin; Richard Wamai; Bertran Auvert; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2011-09-05

6.  Cost-effectiveness of newborn circumcision in reducing lifetime HIV risk among U.S. males.

Authors:  Stephanie L Sansom; Vimalanand S Prabhu; Angela B Hutchinson; Qian An; H Irene Hall; Ram K Shrestha; Arielle Lasry; Allan W Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Phimosis in children.

Authors:  Sukhbir Kaur Shahid
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-03-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.