Literature DB >> 756085

On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response.

H J Rosenhamer, B Lindström, T Lundborg.   

Abstract

The normal click-evoked BSER was studied in a total of 28 young (aged 12 to 40) normally hearing subjects in regard to wave latencies and amplitude ratios, considered to be (besides wave replicability) the characteristics of major interest from a clinical point of view. Latency means and standard deviations (S.D.), and peak-to-peak amplitude ratios between wave V on the one hand and wave I and III, respectively, on the other were determined in a sample of 20 subjects using unfiltered clicks at 20 to 90 dB SL. The latency averages were compared with those of other reports. Latency S.D.s were found to be generally less than 0.25 ms at levels above 50 dB SL. Medians of amplitude ratios (AV/AI and AV/AIII) were found to be significantly greater than unity. No significant latency differences concerning waves I, III, and V could be established on stimulation with condensation, rarefaction, and alternating clicks in 10 subjects at 80 and 60 dB SL, nor did the peak-to-peak amplitude predominance of wave V change with click polarity. With half-octave filtered clicks (2 and 4 kHz), latencies were found to increase significantly (and the responses to become less precise) at 80 and 60 dB SL in a sample of 12 subjects. Changing the interstimulus interval (ISI) from 80 to 60 to 40 ms (at 80 and 60 dB SL) hardly made any difference in regard to I, III, and V latencies, or wave V amplitude supremacy. Finally, a satisfactory test-retest reliability was established in a sample of 6 subjects, the intersession interval being 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 756085     DOI: 10.3109/01050397809076287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  5 in total

1.  Auditory brain-stem responses in syphilis.

Authors:  U Rosenhall; G Roupe
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1981-08

2.  Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Stability of Early Auditory Evoked Potential Components Over Extended Test-Retest Intervals in Young Adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Katharine Fernandez; Chris Zalewski; Hui Cheng; Carmen C Brewer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  A Prospective Study of Etiology and Auditory Profiles in Infants with Congenital Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marlin Johansson; Eva Karltorp; Kaijsa Edholm; Maria Drott; Erik Berninger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Mingxing Zhu; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Xiaochen Wang; Haoshi Zhang; Junjie Yao; Yun Lu; Mingjiang Wang; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay; Wanqing Wu; Shixiong Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.