Literature DB >> 7560660

Diagnostic validation of specific IgE antibody concentrations, skin prick testing, and challenge tests in chemical workers with symptoms of sensitivity to different anhydrides.

X Baur1, A Czuppon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic possibilities of sensitization to various acid anhydrides are limited because of the lack of standardized allergens for the different test systems. This makes the diagnosis of IgE-mediated sensitization caused by occupational exposure difficult.
METHODS: We prepared conjugates of human serum albumin with phthalic, maleic, trimellitic, and pyromellitic anhydrides to be used for IgE estimation by enzyme-allergosorbent test, skin prick tests, and nasal and bronchial challenge tests. Nine anhydride workers, who complained of various respiratory symptoms, were studied.
RESULTS: Of the nine workers, four had immediate-type skin test responses to one or more conjugates. All four subjects had elevated IgE concentrations in addition to two other workers. Three of six nasal challenges and four of nine bronchial challenges resulted in positive responses. All but one of the positive nasal or bronchial test responses were associated with elevated IgE levels. The seven positive challenge test results included five positive skin test responses. On the other hand, in all but two of the subjects with negative challenge test results, no specific IgE could be detected. In these two subjects the negative results were associated with low levels of IgE, and in one, with the absence of asthma. None of the results of tests with unconjugated anhydrides were positive.
CONCLUSIONS: Anhydrides investigated in this study can induce IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, which can be diagnosed by using the respective human serum albumin in estimation of specific IgE and in skin, nasal, and bronchial challenge tests. Estimation of IgE was demonstrated to be more sensitive than skin prick testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7560660     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70292-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of occupational asthma: an update.

Authors:  Edgardo J Jares; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; R Maximiliano Gómez
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Biological and genetic markers in occupational asthma.

Authors:  Gyu-Young Hur; Hae-Sim Park
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Characterization of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate-haptenated human serum albumin and hemoglobin.

Authors:  Morgen Mhike; Itai Chipinda; Justin M Hettick; Reuben H Simoyi; Angela Lemons; Brett J Green; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA) may cause occupational asthma.

Authors:  Milene Torp Madsen; Lars Rauff Skadhauge; Anders Daldorph Nielsen; Jesper Baelum; David Lee Sherson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Diagnostic approach in cases with suspected work-related asthma.

Authors:  Tor B Aasen; P Sherwood Burge; Paul K Henneberger; Vivi Schlünssen; Xaver Baur
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.646

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.