Literature DB >> 7560621

Immediate and late outcome of excimer laser and balloon coronary angioplasty: a quantitative angiographic comparison based on matched lesions.

S Strikwerda1, E Montauban van Swijndregt, D P Foley, E Boersma, V A Umans, R Melkert, P W Serruys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare acute lumen changes and late lumen narrowing during and after excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty, measured by quantitative coronary angiography, with the immediate and long-term outcome of balloon angioplasty alone.
BACKGROUND: Although excimer laser coronary angioplasty is used as an adjunct or alternative to balloon angioplasty, limited comparative data exist regarding the immediate and long-term efficacy of excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone.
METHODS: A series of 53 lesions in 47 consecutive patients successfully treated with excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty were individually matched after completion of 6-month follow-up angiography with 53 successfully treated balloon angioplasty lesions according to vessel location, preprocedural minimal lumen diameter and reference diameter. Immediate and long-term angiographic results were assessed by an automated lumen contour detection algorithm.
RESULTS: Before intervention in the laser and balloon angioplasty groups, respectively, minimal lumen diameter (mean +/- SD) was 0.73 +/- 0.47 and 0.74 +/- 0.46 mm, and reference diameter was 2.71 +/- 0.42 and 2.72 +/- 0.41 mm. Laser angioplasty was followed by adjunctive balloon dilation in 50 lesions. Mean balloon diameter at maximal inflation was similar in both treatment groups (2.61 +/- 0.32 and 2.65 +/- 0.38 mm, respectively), resulting in similar minimal lumen diameters after intervention of 1.77 +/- 0.41 and 1.78 +/- 0.34 mm, respectively. At follow-up angiography, minimal lumen diameter after excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty was 1.17 +/- 0.63 mm, and that after balloon angioplasty alone was 1.46 +/- 0.67 mm (p = 0.02). The angiographic restenosis rates at follow-up using the 50% diameter stenosis cutoff criterion were 57% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative angiographic analysis of a matched group of 106 successfully treated coronary lesions showed a similar immediate outcome but reduced long-term efficacy of excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty compared with that after balloon angioplasty alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7560621     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00278-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Laser angioplasty and recanalization].

Authors:  M Haude; D Welge; L Koch; T Roth; J Ge; D Baumgart; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Smooth excimer laser coronary angioplasty (SELCA) and conventional excimer laser angioplasty: Comparison of vascular injury and smooth muscle cell proliferation.

Authors:  M Oberhoff; A Baumbach; C Herdeg; S Hassenstein; D Y Xie; E Blessing; H Hanke; K K Haase; E Betz; K R Karsch
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.161

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.