Literature DB >> 7560477

Comparative evaluation of the haemodynamic effects of continuous negative external pressure (CNEP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated trauma patients.

L Torelli1, G Zoccali, M Casarin, F Dalla Zuanna, E Lieta, G Conti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the haemodynamic effects of identical values of continuous negative external pressure (CNEP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in a group of mechanically ventilated patients.
SETTING: General ICU, Vicenza Hospital, Italy. PATIENTS: 15 consecutive patients, admitted after road accident trauma.
METHODS: We compared the haemodynamic effects of ZEEP, 10 cmH2O of PEEP, and 10 cmH2O CNEP, applied in random order, in 15 head trauma patients under going controlled mechanical ventilation; 9 had associated thoracic trauma, while 6 did not have lung involvement. CNEP was obtained with a "poncho".
RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in CI during CNEP, compared with both ZEEP and PEEP 10 cmH2O. Accordingly the oxygen delivery index significantly increased during CNEP, compared with PEEP 10 cmH2O. Conversely, Qs/Qt decreased with CNEP, if compared with PEEP, both in patients with and without lung damage.
CONCLUSION: CNEP can significantly increase CI in mechanically ventilated patients in patients with and without associated lung damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7560477     DOI: 10.1007/BF02425157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  10 in total

1.  Effects of pressure breathing on venous pressure; a comparative study of positive pressure applied to the upper respiratory passageway and negative pressure to the body of normal individuals.

Authors:  G J BECK; H E SEANOR; A L BARACH; D GATES
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1952-08       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Optimum end-expiratory airway pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure.

Authors:  P M Suter; B Fairley; M D Isenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Ventilation with end-expiratory pressure in acute lung disease.

Authors:  K J Falke; H Pontoppidan; A Kumar; D E Leith; B Geffin; M B Laver
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Comparison of the effects of continuous negative external chest pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiac index in dogs.

Authors:  P E Krumpe; A Zidulka; J Urbanetti; N R Anthonisen
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1977-01

5.  Echocardiographic evaluation of ventricles during continuous positive airway pressure breathing.

Authors:  F Jardin; J C Farcot; P Guéret; J F Prost; Y Ozier; J P Bourdarias
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-03

6.  Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on left ventricular performance.

Authors:  F Jardin; J C Farcot; L Boisante; N Curien; A Margairaz; J P Bourdarias
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Positive end-expiratory vs negative external pressure mechanical ventilation during pulmonary edema in dogs.

Authors:  P Escourrou; A Harf; G Simonneau; G Atlan; F Lemaire; D Laurent
Journal:  Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir       Date:  1981

8.  Effect of negative-pressure ventilation on lung water in permeability pulmonary edema.

Authors:  M Skaburskis; R P Michel; A Gatensby; A Zidulka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-05

9.  Mechanisms of decreased left ventricular preload during continuous positive pressure ventilation in ARDS.

Authors:  J F Dhainaut; J Y Devaux; J F Monsallier; F Brunet; D Villemant; M F Huyghebaert
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Mean airway pressure vs. positive end-expiratory pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  A Pesenti; R Marcolin; P Prato; M Borelli; A Riboni; L Gattinoni
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 7.598

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effects of continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure on cardiorespiratory function during abdominal hypertension: an experimental study.

Authors:  Franco Valenza; Manuela Irace; Massimiliano Guglielmi; Stefano Gatti; Nicola Bottino; Cecilia Tedesco; Micol Maffioletti; Patrizia Maccagni; Tommaso Fossali; Gabriele Aletti; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Negative pressure ventilation in pediatric critical care setting.

Authors:  Akash Deep; Claudine De Munter; Ajay Desai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Negative- versus positive-pressure ventilation in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Konstantinos Raymondos; Ulrich Molitoris; Marcus Capewell; Björn Sander; Thorben Dieck; Jörg Ahrens; Christian Weilbach; Wolfgang Knitsch; Antonio Corrado
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure combined with high-frequency oscillation improves oxygenation with less impact on blood pressure than high-frequency oscillation alone in a rabbit model of surfactant depletion.

Authors:  Sachie Naito; Takehiko Hiroma; Tomohiko Nakamura
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.