Literature DB >> 7560313

High resolution, magnetization transfer saturation, variable flip angle, time-of-flight MRA in the detection of intracranial vascular stenoses.

A Dagirmanjian1, J S Ross, N Obuchowski, J S Lewin, J A Tkach, P M Ruggieri, T J Masaryk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Factors that restrict 3D TOF MRA are limited resolution, saturation of flow, and degree of background suppression. We evaluated MRA for intracranial stenoses by using a 3D TOF technique that minimizes these factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients underwent MRA and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The MRA studies were performed on a 1.5 T Siemens SP 4000 system. Integrated techniques applied to the conventional 3D TOF acquisition included the following: (a) 256 x 256 matrix with a 140 mm FOV and 0.9 mm slice thickness, yielding a 0.54 x 0.54 x 0.9 mm3 voxel; (b) tilted optimized nonsaturating excitation (TONE); and (c) magnetization transfer saturation (MTS). The intraarterial DSA was performed on a Siemens Angiostar system with a 1,024 x 1,024 noninterpolated matrix. The MRAs were reviewed by two neuroradiologists. Two hundred seventy-seven vessels were evaluated for a total of 806 segments. Vessel segments were evaluated with a 5 point scale.
RESULTS: The estimated accuracy of MRA for detecting stenosis over all intracranial vessel segments was 0.88 +/- 0.03 and 0.89 +/- 0.02 for the two readers, respectively. The estimated accuracy ranged from 0.94 +/- 0.02 and 0.93 +/- 0.02 for detecting internal carotid artery stenosis by the two readers, respectively, to 0.65 +/- 0.17 and 0.71 +/- 0.15 for detecting distal vertebral artery stenosis. In vessels determined by catheter angiography to be stenosis-free, reader confidence at the proximal versus distal segments was similar for the internal carotid, basilar, and posterior cerebral arteries. However, for the anterior and middle cerebral arteries, one or both readers were more confident in diagnosing the proximal segment.
CONCLUSION: High resolution MTS TONE 3D TOF MRA is an accurate technique for the screening of medium and large vessel intracranial stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7560313     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199509000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  12 in total

1.  To TOF or not to TOF: strategies for non-contrast-enhanced intracranial MRA at 7 T.

Authors:  Stefan Maderwald; Susanne C Ladd; Elke R Gizewski; Oliver Kraff; Jens M Theysohn; Karsten Wicklow; Christoph Moenninghoff; Isabel Wanke; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Cerebral hypoperfusion secondary to radiation arteritis presenting with recurrent syncope.

Authors:  Khalid Bashar; Seamus McHugh; Paul Burke; Eamon Kavanagh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-23

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; A Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Authors:  Mohammad Farahmand; Siamak Farahangiz; Mahnaz Yadollahi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2013-10

4.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison of unenhanced and contrast enhanced techniques.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Val M Runge; John N Morelli; Kenneth D Williams; L Gill Naul; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional transcranial color-coded sonography of intracranial stenoses.

Authors:  Christof Klötzsch; Alessandro Bozzato; Gero Lammers; Michael Mull; Johannes Noth
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Ken Ono; Masafumi Nagano; Kousei Maruoka; Shozaburo Uemura; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Angiography of primary central nervous system angiitis of childhood: conventional angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography at presentation.

Authors:  R I Aviv; S M Benseler; G DeVeber; E D Silverman; P N Tyrrell; L M Tsang; D Armstrong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Near-isotropic noncontrast MRA of the renal and peripheral arteries using a thin-slab stack-of-stars quiescent interval slice-selective acquisition.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Emily Aherne; Nondas Leloudas; Jianing Pang; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: diagnosis with MR angiography.

Authors:  C B Grandin; G Cosnard; F Hammer; T P Duprez; G Stroobandt; P Mathurin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Magnetic resonance angiography in suspected cerebral vasculitis.

Authors:  Philippe Demaerel; Nele De Ruyter; Frederik Maes; Beatrijs Velghe; Guido Wilms
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.