Literature DB >> 7560312

Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study.

G Fürst1, M Hofer, M Sitzer, T Kahn, E Müller, U Mödder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Signal loss due to poststenotic turbulence is one remaining limitation in the clinical use of MRA. The objective of this study was to determine the factors influencing poststenotic signal loss (PSL) in a stenotic tube system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With use of a two-dimensional gradient echo sequence (FLASH), the influence of (a) the degree of stenosis (50, 75, and 91% cross-sectional area reduction), (b) flow velocity (12, 47, 71, and 94 cm/s), (c) TE (3, 6, 13, and 20 ms), and (d) flip angle (5, 10, 20, ... , 90 degrees) on the length of PSL was measured in a nonpulsatile stenotic tube system. To quantify the effect of first-order gradient motion refocusing (GMR), the signal intensity ratio from flow-compensated and -uncompensated images was calculated. For statistical analysis, multiple regression analysis and unpaired Student t test were used.
RESULTS: In the flow model used, the length of PSL increased significantly with the degree of stenosis (beta ST' = 0.483 mm/%, beta ST" = 0.447 mm/%, p < 0.0001), flow velocity (beta v' = 0.297 s, beta v" = 0.213 s, p < 0.0001), and TE (beta TE = 1.88 mm/ms, p < 0.0001), respectively, whereas no correlation emerged for varying flip angles (beta alpha = 0.0214, p = 0.29). First-order GMR reduced significantly PSL in through-plane measurements (p < 0.0001). Maximal signal-enhancing effects of first-order GMR were observed 1-3 cm distal to the stenosis.
CONCLUSION: Flow model parameters (i.e., degree of stenosis, flow velocity) markedly influenced the length of PSL that could be compensate for by use orf shortened TEs and first-order GMR. Varying flip angles had no significant influence on PSL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7560312     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199509000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Gadolinium contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries with multiple bolus injection: scan optimization in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  J J Westenberg; M N Wasser; R J van der Geest; P M Pattynama; A de Roos; J Vanderschoot; J H Reiber
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

2.  MR angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: adequate to evaluate vasospasm-induced vascular narrowing?

Authors:  Elke Hattingen; Stella Blasel; Richard Dumesnil; Hartmut Vatter; Friedhelm E Zanella; Stefan Weidauer
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ozkan Ozsarlak; Johan W Van Goethem; Menno Maes; Paul M Parizel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-12-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  MR angiography and imaging for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  A J Degnan; G Gallagher; Z Teng; J Lu; Q Liu; J H Gillard
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Ken Ono; Masafumi Nagano; Kousei Maruoka; Shozaburo Uemura; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Suzie Bash; J Pablo Villablanca; Reza Jahan; Gary Duckwiler; Monica Tillis; Chelsea Kidwell; Jeffrey Saver; James Sayre
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.