Literature DB >> 7559178

Acoustic features and acoustic changes are represented by different central pathways.

C King1, T McGee, E W Rubel, T Nicol, N Kraus.   

Abstract

The central processing of acoustic stimulus changes can be observed neurophysiologically in the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential (MMN). Stimuli differing in interaural phase were used to investigate the contributions of the primary and non-primary auditory pathways to the encoding of binaural stimuli and to investigate passively elicited measures of binaural processing in experimental animals. In guinea pigs, the MMN was obtained in response to 1000 Hz tones embedded in white noise (S:N = 2 dB). Using a modified oddball paradigm (that is, two stimuli presented in a series, each with a different probability of occurrence), stimuli were presented binaurally with both the tone and noise in-phase to the two ears (S0N0) as the standard stimulus ans the tone 180 degrees out-of-phase (S(PI)N0) as the deviant stimulus. The MMN, by definition, should occur only in response to a change, or 'mismatch,' between the standard and deviant stimuli. The response to the deviant stimulus in the oddball paradigm was compared to the response to the same stimulus when presented in a series alone. The responses to S0N0 and S(PI)N0 collected in a series alone, termed the intrinsic responses, were also compared. Responses were recorded from two surface epidural electrodes - one at the posterior midline and one over the left temporal lobe. AEPs from these locations have been shown to reflect the activity of primary and non-primary thalamo-cortical pathways respectively. A significant MMN was observed at the midline electrode, but no MMN was observed over the temporal lobe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7559178     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00028-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Human central auditory plasticity associated with tone sequence learning.

Authors:  Julie Marie Gottselig; Daniel Brandeis; Gilberte Hofer-Tinguely; Alexander A Borbély; Peter Achermann
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Memory-based mismatch response to frequency changes in rats.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Gabor Stefanics; Miriam Nokia; Arto Lipponen; Fengyu Cong; Markku Penttonen; Timo Ruusuvirta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mismatch brain response to speech sound changes in rats.

Authors:  Mustak Ahmed; Tanel Mällo; Paavo H T Leppänen; Jarmo Hämäläinen; Laura Ayräväinen; Timo Ruusuvirta; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-28

Review 4.  The cortical modulation of stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory midbrain and thalamus: a potential neuronal correlate for predictive coding.

Authors:  Manuel S Malmierca; Lucy A Anderson; Flora M Antunes
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09

Review 5.  Adaptation in the auditory system: an overview.

Authors:  David Pérez-González; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21

6.  Enhancement of sleep slow waves: underlying mechanisms and practical consequences.

Authors:  Michele Bellesi; Brady A Riedner; Gary N Garcia-Molina; Chiara Cirelli; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28

7.  NR2B Antagonist CP-101,606 Abolishes Pitch-Mediated Deviance Detection in Awake Rats.

Authors:  Digavalli V Sivarao; Ping Chen; Yili Yang; Yu-Wen Li; Rick Pieschl; Michael K Ahlijanian
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Stimulus-specific adaptation and deviance detection in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yaneri A Ayala; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Cortical mapping of mismatch negativity with deviance detection property in rat.

Authors:  Tomoyo Isoguchi Shiramatsu; Ryohei Kanzaki; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Topographic Distribution of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation across Auditory Cortical Fields in the Anesthetized Rat.

Authors:  Javier Nieto-Diego; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.