Literature DB >> 7558083

A "minimal essential Mhc" and an "unrecognized Mhc": two extremes in selection for polymorphism.

J Kaufman1, H Völk, H J Wallny.   

Abstract

The high polymorphism of classical Mhc molecules found in mammals is not simply the result of strong selection for pathogen resistance in the recent past, since there are virtually no examples of diseases caused by infectious pathogens for which resistance is determined by particular Mhc haplotypes, and in the best-studied case, a particular aspect of malaria in humans, the selection is remarkably weak. We discuss three possibilities to explain high polymorphism in mammals: accumulating, merging and boosting. The mammalian Mhc is complicated and redundant, so that every Mhc haplotype may give some level of resistance due to multiple classical Mhc genes as well as other disease resistance genes; this frustrates the attempts to demonstrate selection for disease resistance. We have looked at two vertebrate groups that may represent two extreme examples of selection for Mhc polymorphism. Birds, like mammals, have highly a polymorphic Mhc that determines strong allograft rejection. However, chickens have a much smaller, compact and simpler Mhc than mammals, as though the Mhc has been stripped down to the essentials during evolution. The selection on a single Mhc gene should be much stronger than on a large multigene family and, in fact, there are a number of viral diseases for which resistance and susceptibility are determined by particular chicken Mhc haplotypes. We have determined the peptide motifs for the chicken class I molecules from a number of haplotypes, which may explain some disease associations quite simply. On the other hand, salamanders have very low Mhc polymorphism and slow allograft rejection. We have isolated axolotl Mhc molecules and shown that they cosegregate with the locus that determines graft rejection in the axolotl, have only a few alleles and only weakly stimulate axolotl T lymphocytes in mixed lymphocyte culture. We believe that salamanders have classical Mhc molecules but most T cells do not recognize them, so that there is no strong selection for polymorphism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7558083     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1995.tb00670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Rev        ISSN: 0105-2896            Impact factor:   12.988


  99 in total

1.  Differential cytokine responses following Marek's disease virus infection of chickens differing in resistance to Marek's disease.

Authors:  Pete Kaiser; Greg Underwood; Fred Davison
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Constraints on haplotype structure and variable gene frequencies suggest a functional hierarchy within cattle MHC class I.

Authors:  Gemma F Codner; James Birch; John A Hammond; Shirley A Ellis
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.846

3.  New take on comparative immunology: relevance to immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ena Wang; Adriana Albini; David F Stroncek; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Haplotype variation, recombination, and gene conversion within the turkey MHC-B locus.

Authors:  Lee D Chaves; Gretchen M Faile; Stacy B Krueth; Julie A Hendrickson; Kent M Reed
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  The genome sequence of Atlantic cod reveals a unique immune system.

Authors:  Bastiaan Star; Alexander J Nederbragt; Sissel Jentoft; Unni Grimholt; Martin Malmstrøm; Tone F Gregers; Trine B Rounge; Jonas Paulsen; Monica H Solbakken; Animesh Sharma; Ola F Wetten; Anders Lanzén; Roger Winer; James Knight; Jan-Hinnerk Vogel; Bronwen Aken; Oivind Andersen; Karin Lagesen; Ave Tooming-Klunderud; Rolf B Edvardsen; Kirubakaran G Tina; Mari Espelund; Chirag Nepal; Christopher Previti; Bård Ove Karlsen; Truls Moum; Morten Skage; Paul R Berg; Tor Gjøen; Heiner Kuhl; Jim Thorsen; Ketil Malde; Richard Reinhardt; Lei Du; Steinar D Johansen; Steve Searle; Sigbjørn Lien; Frank Nilsen; Inge Jonassen; Stig W Omholt; Nils Chr Stenseth; Kjetill S Jakobsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genetic mapping of the major histocompatibility complex in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  Robert Ekblom; Jessica Stapley; Alex D Ball; Tim Birkhead; Terry Burke; Jon Slate
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  Characterisation of a cluster of TRIM-B30.2 genes in the chicken MHC B locus.

Authors:  Thomas Ruby; Bertrand Bed'Hom; Hakan Wittzell; Véronique Morin; Anne Oudin; Rima Zoorob
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  MHC class IIB gene sequences and expression in quails (Coturnix japonica) selected for high and low antibody responses.

Authors:  Sayoko Shimizu; Takashi Shiina; Kazuyoshi Hosomichi; Shinji Takahashi; Takumi Koyama; Takashi Onodera; Jerzy K Kulski; Hidetoshi Inoko
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 9.  2004 Nomenclature for the chicken major histocompatibility (B and Y) complex.

Authors:  Marcia M Miller; Larry D Bacon; Karel Hala; Henry D Hunt; Sandra J Ewald; Jim Kaufman; Rima Zoorob; W Elwood Briles
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.846

10.  Single locus typing of MHC class I and class II B loci in a population of red jungle fowl.

Authors:  K Worley; M Gillingham; P Jensen; L J Kennedy; T Pizzari; J Kaufman; D S Richardson
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 2.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.