Literature DB >> 7557173

Pneumatic dilation in achalasia with a low-compliance balloon: results of a 5-year prospective evaluation.

T Wehrmann1, V Jacobi, M Jung, B Lembcke, W F Caspary.   

Abstract

To evaluate long-term efficacy and side effects after pneumatic dilation with low-compliance balloons, 40 patients with achalasia were prospectively studied during a 5-year period. All patients were investigated before, 4-6 weeks after, and at 28 +/- 15 months (final visit) after pneumatic dilation. Additionally, 12 patients underwent 24-hour esophageal pH-metry before and 26 +/- 14 months after dilation. Initial symptomatic success was obtained in 35 of 40 patients (87.5%). The remaining five and another seven patients with recurrent dysphagia underwent a second dilation, and two of these patients finally underwent esophagomyotomy. Effective dilation was reflected by a significant decrease of the symptom scores (p < 0.01) and an increase of the gastric cardia diameter both at 4-6 weeks after dilation and at the final visit (p < 0.01). Dilation reduced the lower esophageal sphincter pressure from 28.3 +/- 0.8 mmHg to 16.4 +/- 6.4 mmHg at the 4-6 weeks exam and to 14.7 +/- 5.5 mmHg at the final visit, respectively (p < 0.01). Neither the diameter of the esophageal body nor the motility of the tubular esophagus was affected by pneumatic. Esophageal pH-metry showed an increase of the number and duration of reflux episodes (pH < 4) after dilation (p < 0.05), whereas only one patient reported heartburn and another asymptomatic patient revealed esophagitis I0 at endoscopy. Therefore, pneumatic dilation with low compliance balloons proved to be safe and long lasting treatment of achalasia. Although prolonged esophageal acid exposure was measurable after dilation, clinically relevant gastroesophageal reflux occurred in only 5% (n = 2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7557173     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70239-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

Review 1.  Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Stavros Nicholas Stavropoulos; David Friedel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Endoluminal vs. extraluminal cardiomyotomy for oesophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Giovanni Zaninotto; Sheraz Markar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Achalasia: the usefulness of manometry for evaluation of treatment.

Authors:  P Alonso; B González-Conde; R Macenlle; S Pita; J L Vázquez-Iglesias
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Long-term results of graded pneumatic dilatation under endoscopic guidance in patients with primary esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Ahmet Dobrucali; Yusuf Erzin; Murat Tuncer; Ahmet Dirican
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pneumatic dilation for achalasia: late results of a prospective follow up investigation.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; I Gockel; G Bernhard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for achalasia.

Authors:  J Barry O'Connor; Mendel E Singer; Thomas F Imperiale; Michael F Vaezi; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Importance of preoperative and postoperative pH monitoring in patients with esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  M G Patti; M Arcerito; J Tong; A Wang; C V Feo; S J Mulvihill; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Predictors of a better outcome of pneumatic dilatation in patients with primary achalasia.

Authors:  Yuriko Tanaka; Katsuhiko Iwakiri; Noriyuki Kawami; Hirohito Sano; Mariko Umezawa; Makoto Kotoyori; Yoshio Hoshihara; Tsutomu Nomura; Masao Miyashita; Choitsu Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 10.  A controversy that has been tough to swallow: is the treatment of achalasia now digested?

Authors:  Garrett R Roll; Charlotte Rabl; Ruxandra Ciovica; Sofia Peeva; Guilherme M Campos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.