BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a promising procedure for imaging mesenteric vascular structures. METHODS: Duplex and color Doppler endosonography were used to prospectively evaluate 20 asymptomatic paid volunteers. Subsequently, 11 patients with nondiagnostic transabdominal ultrasound and suspected thrombosis of the splenic and/or portal veins or a portosystemic shunt were evaluated with duplex endosonography. The final diagnosis was based on CT, angiography, and/or surgery or autopsy findings in 9 of 11 patients. RESULTS: In normal volunteers, mesenteric vessel flow velocities and diameters were similar to previously described values. In 10 of the 11 patients with failed transabdominal ultrasound, duplex endosonography was able to provide the correct diagnosis (accuracy of ultrasound 0% versus EUS 91%, p < .001). Mean portal vein diameter was greater in the patient group than in the normal volunteers (18.5 mm versus 10.7 mm, p < .001) and all of the normal volunteers had a portal vein diameter less than 13 mm. No complications were experienced. CONCLUSION: Duplex endosonography allows visualization of the intra-abdominal vasculature and can be considered when transabdominal ultrasound is nondiagnostic in patients with suspected thrombosis of their splenic vein, portal vein, or portosystemic shunt. EUS is able to identify indirect findings of portal hypertension including portal vein enlargement and venous collaterals.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a promising procedure for imaging mesenteric vascular structures. METHODS: Duplex and color Doppler endosonography were used to prospectively evaluate 20 asymptomatic paid volunteers. Subsequently, 11 patients with nondiagnostic transabdominal ultrasound and suspected thrombosis of the splenic and/or portal veins or a portosystemic shunt were evaluated with duplex endosonography. The final diagnosis was based on CT, angiography, and/or surgery or autopsy findings in 9 of 11 patients. RESULTS: In normal volunteers, mesenteric vessel flow velocities and diameters were similar to previously described values. In 10 of the 11 patients with failed transabdominal ultrasound, duplex endosonography was able to provide the correct diagnosis (accuracy of ultrasound 0% versus EUS 91%, p < .001). Mean portal vein diameter was greater in the patient group than in the normal volunteers (18.5 mm versus 10.7 mm, p < .001) and all of the normal volunteers had a portal vein diameter less than 13 mm. No complications were experienced. CONCLUSION: Duplex endosonography allows visualization of the intra-abdominal vasculature and can be considered when transabdominal ultrasound is nondiagnostic in patients with suspected thrombosis of their splenic vein, portal vein, or portosystemic shunt. EUS is able to identify indirect findings of portal hypertension including portal vein enlargement and venous collaterals.
Authors: P Katsinelos; G Chatzimavroudis; Ch Zavos; I Pilpilidis; K Fasoulas; B Papaziogas; J Kountouras Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Barbara Braden; Sean Burmeister; Silvia Carrara; Xinwu Cui; Milena Di Leo; Yi Dong; Pietro Fusaroli; Uwe Gottschalk; Andrew J Healey; Michael Hocke; Stephan Hollerbach; Julio Iglesias Garcia; André Ignee; Christian Jürgensen; Michel Kahaleh; Masayuki Kitano; Rastislav Kunda; Alberto Larghi; Kathleen Möller; Bertrand Napoleon; Kofi W Oppong; Maria Chiara Petrone; Adrian Saftoiu; Rajesh Puri; Anand V Sahai; Erwin Santo; Malay Sharma; Assaad Soweid; Siyu Sun; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Peter Vilmann; Hans Seifert; Christian Jenssen Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2019 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.628