Literature DB >> 7556833

Provider-associated factors in obstetric interventions.

M Pel1, M H Heres, A A Hart, F van der Veen, P E Treffers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess which factors influence provider-associated differences in obstetric interventions. STUDY
DESIGN: A survey of obstetricians and co-workers in a sample consisting of 38 Dutch hospitals was taken, using a questionnaire that contained questions about personal and hospital-policy data, and 19 clinical problems with a choice between intervention and non-intervention. From the clinical problems an Intervention Score was assembled. The influence of the personal and hospital-policy items on this Intervention Score was studied by analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Overall the Intervention Score was low, with considerable interindividual variation. Four personal/hospital items influenced the Intervention Score: the teacher could affect the score in either direction; the increasing age of the obstetrician and routine electronic fetal monitoring had an increasing effect; employment of midwives had a decreasing effect. Other factors, including litigation, had no effect.
CONCLUSION: Supplier-induced differences do exist in obstetric interventions and are influenced by personal and hospital-policy factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7556833     DOI: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02129-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

1.  Childbirth education in the 21st century: an immodest proposal.

Authors:  Charlotte A De Vries; Raymond G De Vries
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

2.  Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Pien M Offerhaus; Caroline Geerts; Ank de Jonge; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Jos W R Twisk; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Regional variations in childbirth interventions in the Netherlands: a nationwide explorative study.

Authors:  A E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; D C Zondag; M Nieuwenhuijze; T Van den Akker; C J Verhoeven; C Geerts; F Schellevis; A De Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Alban Fejza; Mrika Aliu; Peter Jüni; David C Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Esra Zhubi; Krenare Grezda; Blerta Kryeziu; Jeta Bunjaku; Fitim Sadiku; Riaz Agahi; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Manila Bonciani; George Little
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; María Pueyo; Herminia Biescas; Cristina Colls; Isabel Espiga; Joanna White; Xavi Espada; Josep Fusté; Vicente Ortún
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Jeroen van Dillen; Irene de Graaf; Frank Vandenbussche; Lianne Holten
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.