Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation.

Several theories have been proposed to explain our ability to recognise objects from a number of viewpoints. Orientation-dependent accounts emphasize the position of the object relative to the viewer, while orientation-independent accounts (e.g. Marr) rely on descriptions of an object's component parts relative to its principal axis of elongation. An opportunity to compare the merit of these theories has arisen in a patient (L.G.) who had a rare neuropsychological sign in which knowledge of the canonical upright of object drawings was profoundly disrupted. Such orientation errors were evident in her drawings from memory and to copy, and in an orientation-matching task. In a critical experiment she showed a deficit in providing the canonical upright of individual object drawings that was independent of any difficulty in object recognition. The implications of these data for theories of object recognition are discussed.