Literature DB >> 7554976

Comparative study on intermittent versus continuous use of a contraceptive pill administered by vaginal route.

E M Coutinho1, E O'Dwyer, I C Barbosa, Z P Gu, M M Shaaban, M Aboul-Oyoon, H Abdel Aleem.   

Abstract

A multicenter, international, randomized, comparative trial was conducted to assess the acceptability, efficacy and safety of two different schedules of a contraceptive pill, containing 250 micrograms levonorgestrel and 50 micrograms ethinyl estradiol, administered by the vaginal route. One schedule of daily administration for 21 days with a seven-day interruption to allow withdrawal bleeding was compared to daily administration without interruption for bleeding. A total of 900 women were recruited in three countries, Brazil, Egypt and China; 7,090 women-months of vaginal pill use were recorded (3,364 using the pills intermittently and 3,726 continuously). Four undesired pregnancies occurred, one in Egypt and three in China, all four in women using the pills intermittently. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.486) in pregnancy rate between the two groups. There were no other significant differences in discontinuation rates despite marked differences in bleeding patterns, amenorrhea predominating in the continuous use group. Hemoglobin levels increased significantly in the two groups but hematocrit was significantly higher in the continuous use group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; Americas; Arab Countries; Asia; Brazil; China; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Estrogen; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Eastern Asia; Egypt; Ethinyl Estradiol; Family Planning; Latin America; Levonorgestrel; Mediterranean Countries; Menstruation; Method Acceptability; Northern Africa; Population; Population Dynamics; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; South America; Studies; Time Factors; Vaginal Spermicides; Vaginal Suppository

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7554976     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00101-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

Review 1.  Long-cycle treatment with oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Herbert Kuhl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Alison Edelman; Elizabeth Micks; Maria F Gallo; Jeffrey T Jensen; David A Grimes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-29

3.  Evaluation of extended and continuous use oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Kristen Page Wright; Julia V Johnson
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Effects of vaginal administration of conjugated estrogens tablet on sexual function in postmenopausal women with sexual dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul; Krasean Panyakhamlerd; Thanittha Chatsuwan; Chai Ariyasriwatana; Ammarin Suwan; Charoen Taweepolcharoen; Nimit Taechakraichana
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.