Literature DB >> 7554624

Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip.

A E Gross1, C R Hutchison, M Alexeeff, N Mahomed, K Leitch, E Morsi.   

Abstract

Proximal femoral allografts have been used to restore uncontained circumferential defects of the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty. These grafts are used with long stem components that are cemented to the graft but not the host. The junction of host and graft is stabilized by the stem and a step cut with cerclage wires. Autograft bone is placed at the junctions to induce union. Full weightbearing is delayed until union occurs between the graft and the host femur, usually by 3 months. One hundred sixty-eight structural femoral allografts were done; average followup was 4.8 years as of January 1, 1995. Success was defined as an increase in the clinical score of at least 20 points, a stable implant, and no need for further surgery related to the allograft. The success rate in 130 patients with at least 2 years followup is 85%. There have been 17 revisions in 16 patients: 3 revisions for infection, 8 for dislocation, 5 for nonunion, and 1 for pain. The revision rate is 10.1%. Radiographic analysis showed 7 nonunions, minor resorption in 6 patients, and significant resorption in 1 patient. All implants are stable with no lucent lines. The results support using this technique for full circumferential segmental proximal femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7554624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Structural allograft and cemented long-stem prosthesis for complex revision hip arthroplasty: use of a trochanteric claw plate improves final hip function.

Authors:  Laurent Vastel; Camille Thevenin Lemoine; Marcel Kerboull; Jean Pierre Courpied
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Antibiotic modification of native grafts: improving upon nature's scaffolds.

Authors:  Constantinos Ketonis; Christopher S Adams; Stephanie Barr; Amiethab Aiyer; Irving M Shapiro; Javad Parvizi; Noreen J Hickok
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Reconstruction of the acetabulum in THA using femoral head autografts in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Markus D Schofer; Thomas Pressel; Jan Schmitt; Thomas J Heyse; Ulrich Boudriot
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Hou-Tsung Chen; Cheng-Ta Wu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Hsin-Nung Shih; Jun-Wen Wang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Results of uncemented distal locked prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty with proximal femoral bone loss: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Sanjay Agarwala; Hari Ram Jhunjhunwala; Jawahir A Pachore; Siddharth B Joglekar; Krishna Kiran Eachempati
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Cemented allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction for the proximal femur tumor.

Authors:  Li Min; Fan Tang; Hong Duan; Yong Zhou; Wen-Li Zhang; Rui Shi; Chong-Qi Tu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Uncemented allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Li Min; Jing Peng; Hong Duan; Wenli Zhang; Yong Zhou; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  The Cost of Routine Follow-Up in Total Joint Arthroplasty and the Influence of These Visits on Treatment Plans.

Authors:  Thomas J Hendricks; Alexander C M Chong; Robert P Cusick
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2018-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.