R L Bauer1, E Busch, E Levine, S B Edge. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) carries an ominous prognosis. Before 1988, women with IBC at our institution were treated with neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with or without vincristine and prednisone (CMF/VP). After 1988, women with IBC were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (FAC). This study compares these two regimens with regard to response and survival. METHODS: The records of all women presenting between January 1973 and December 1991 with a stage IIIB (T4d, any N, MO) breast cancer with proven dermal lymphatic invasion by tumor cells were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The study comprised 38 women; 28 received CMF (22 CMF, 6 CMF/VP), and 10 received FAC. The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy in the CMF/VP group was 57% (40% PR, 17% CR), and 100% (60% PR, 40% CR) in the FAC group. The median overall survival for women receiving CMF/VP was 18 months compared with 30 months for women receiving FAC (p = 0.02). The median disease-free survivals for the CMF/VP and FAC groups were 6 and 24 months, respectively (p < 0.001). When comparing responders and nonresponders with CMF/VP induction therapy, the responders had a significantly longer overall median survival (24 versus 10 months) (p < 0.001) and disease-free median survival (8 versus 2 months) (p < 0.001). All of the five patients remaining alive received FAC with 80% (four of five) having a complete response. These four patients subsequently underwent mastectomy and radiation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy regimen improves overall and disease-free median survivals when compared with the previously used CMF combination in the treatment of IBC. A favorable response to induction chemotherapy also appeared to be associated with an improved survival.
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) carries an ominous prognosis. Before 1988, women with IBC at our institution were treated with neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with or without vincristine and prednisone (CMF/VP). After 1988, women with IBC were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (FAC). This study compares these two regimens with regard to response and survival. METHODS: The records of all women presenting between January 1973 and December 1991 with a stage IIIB (T4d, any N, MO) breast cancer with proven dermal lymphatic invasion by tumor cells were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The study comprised 38 women; 28 received CMF (22 CMF, 6 CMF/VP), and 10 received FAC. The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy in the CMF/VP group was 57% (40% PR, 17% CR), and 100% (60% PR, 40% CR) in the FAC group. The median overall survival for women receiving CMF/VP was 18 months compared with 30 months for women receiving FAC (p = 0.02). The median disease-free survivals for the CMF/VP and FAC groups were 6 and 24 months, respectively (p < 0.001). When comparing responders and nonresponders with CMF/VP induction therapy, the responders had a significantly longer overall median survival (24 versus 10 months) (p < 0.001) and disease-free median survival (8 versus 2 months) (p < 0.001). All of the five patients remaining alive received FAC with 80% (four of five) having a complete response. These four patients subsequently underwent mastectomy and radiation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy regimen improves overall and disease-free median survivals when compared with the previously used CMF combination in the treatment of IBC. A favorable response to induction chemotherapy also appeared to be associated with an improved survival.
Authors: J Rouëssé; S Friedman; D Sarrazin; H Mouriesse; T Le Chevalier; R Arriagada; M Spielmann; A Papacharalambous; F May-Levin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1986-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Veronesi; S Frustaci; U Tirelli; E Galligioni; M G Trovò; D Crivellari; M D Magri; S Tumolo; E Grigoletto Journal: Tumori Date: 1981 May-Jun
Authors: Zsolt Horváth; László Torday; Erika Hitre; Erna Ganofszky; Eva Juhos; Ferenc Czeglédi; László Urbán; Csaba Polgár; István Láng; Sándor Eckhardt; Miklós Kásler Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: P Viens; T Palangié; M Janvier; M Fabbro; H Roché; T Delozier; J P Labat; C Linassier; B Audhuy; F Feuilhade; B Costa; R Delva; H Cure; F Rousseau; A Guillot; M Mousseau; J M Ferrero; V J Bardou; J Jacquemier; P Pouillart Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: D Genet; C Lejeune; P Bonnier; Y Aubard; L Venat-Bouvet; D J Adjadj; J Martin; J L Labourey; A Benyoub; P Clavère; V Lebrun-Ly; P Juin; L Piana; N Tubiana-Mathieu Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 7.640