Literature DB >> 7552081

Cutaneous melanoma: pathology, relevant prognostic indicators and progression.

A Slominski1, J Ross, M C Mihm.   

Abstract

Malignant melanoma, one of the most rapidly increasing malignancies in man, has recently received substantial attention in the world literature concerning application of traditional morphologic and newer immunologic and molecular biologic methods of predicting progression and ultimate clinical outcome. Although clinical features of patient sex, age and anatomic site of the lesion are important, classic morphologic variables defining prognosis remain the cornerstone of predicting disease outcome. Extent of radial growth phase and the two microstaging methods of measuring tumor thickness and determining level of invasion remain the critical disease progression predictors. Assessment of mitotic rate, number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and determining the presence of regression, ulceration, and epithelioid cell component, microscopic satellites and vascular invasion are also important. More recently a variety of molecular and biochemical prognostic markers have been cited for prediction of disease recurrence and metastasis. Both overexpression and down regulation of a variety of cell adhesion molecules have been implicated in disease progression as has alterations in the plasminogen activation system. A series of growth factors, growth factor receptors, oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have also been considered. Structural and numerical genomic DNA abnormalities, cell proliferation markers and DNA ploidy status have also been considered. Recently a variety of serum and blood markers indicating disease persistence or progression have been studied including melanin synthesis precursors and intermediate compounds of melanogenesis. Molecular detection by PCR of melanogenesis specific mRNA may become the most sensitive prognostic marker of the future. At present histopathologic and clinical criteria remain the cornerstones of predicting prognosis in malignant melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7552081     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med Bull        ISSN: 0007-1420            Impact factor:   4.291


  5 in total

1.  A phase II study of gefitinib in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Sapna P Patel; Kevin B Kim; Nicholas E Papadopoulos; Wen-Jen Hwu; Patrick Hwu; Victor G Prieto; Menashe Bar-Eli; Maya Zigler; Andrey Dobroff; Yulia Bronstein; Roland L Bassett; Anna G Vardeleon; Agop Y Bedikian
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Immunohistological characterisation of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in melanocytic skin lesions.

Authors:  M R Hussein; D A H Elsers; S A Fadel; A-E M Omar
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Population-based study of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the Granada province (Spain), 1985-1992.

Authors:  R Ocaña-Riola; C Martinez-Garcia; S Serrano; A Buendía-Eisman; C Ruiz-Baena; J Canela-Soler
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Automatic detection of melanoma progression by histological analysis of secondary sites.

Authors:  Nikita V Orlov; Ashani T Weeraratna; Stephen M Hewitt; Christopher E Coletta; John D Delaney; D Mark Eckley; Lior Shamir; Ilya G Goldberg
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  ACP best practice no 162. The histological reporting of melanoma. Association of Clinical Pathologists.

Authors:  E Calonje
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.